Zee goes on appeal against court order to answer 17 questions raised by Mahendra Singh Dhoni

The interrogatories have been raised in a defamation suit filed by the cricketer seeking damages of ₹100 crore for having dragged his name in the IPL betting scam

March 08, 2023 11:40 pm | Updated 11:40 pm IST - CHENNAI

Mr. Dhoni had filed the suit in 2014 against Zee Media Corporation, journalist Sudhir Chaudhary and Indian Police Service officer G. Sampath Kumar.

Mr. Dhoni had filed the suit in 2014 against Zee Media Corporation, journalist Sudhir Chaudhary and Indian Police Service officer G. Sampath Kumar. | Photo Credit: File Photo

Zee Media Corporation has preferred an appeal before a Division Bench of the Madras High Court against a single judge’s order directing it to answer 17 questions raised by cricketer Mahendra Singh Dhoni in a defamation suit filed by him demanding ₹100 crore in damages for having dragged his name in the IPL betting scam.

The original side appeal was listed for admission before the third Division Bench of Justices R. Mahadevan and Mohammed Shaffiq on Wednesday but the judges adjourned the hearing to Friday. The appellant corporation was aggrieved over an order passed by Justice G. Chandrasekharan on November 11, 2022.

Mr. Dhoni had filed the suit in 2014 against Zee Media Corporation, journalist Sudhir Chaudhary and Indian Police Service officer G. Sampath Kumar. Zee had recently filed its reply to the suit by way of a written statement but the cricketer found the response to be very vague and not answering the specific allegations levelled by him.

Therefore, he took out an application, through Senior Counsel P.R. Raman, seeking the leave of the court to deliver 17 interrogatories to the media house and urged the court to issue summons calling upon the company to give evidence. Justice A.A. Nakkiran of the High Court allowed the cricketer’s application on July 22, 2022.

Immediately, Zee Media took out an application urging the court to set aside the July 22 order. The company accused the cricketer of attempting to know the evidence available against him, even before the commencement of trial in the civil suit, in the guise of issuing the interrogatories and eliciting answers for them.

Justice Chandrasekharan dismissed the media company’s application on November 11 and hence the present appeal. The judge had held that Zee had not made out any ground for setting aside the July 22 order and further observed that it would not be possible for a single judge to set aside another single judge’s order.

The judge also agreed with Mr. Raman that the interrogatories could be set aside only if the court finds them to be unreasonable, vexatious, prolix, oppressive, unnecessary or scandalous. . “None of these grounds exist in this case, for raising objections to the interrogatories or setting aside or striking them out,” the judge had concluded.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.