Water Commission experts inspect Grand Anicut Canal

Will make an assessment for the proposed renovation and modernisation of the canal

October 09, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:56 am IST - THANJAVUR:

Members of the Central Water Commission at the Grand Anicut Canal along with the PWD Chief Engineer Asokan in Thanjavur district.

Members of the Central Water Commission at the Grand Anicut Canal along with the PWD Chief Engineer Asokan in Thanjavur district.

A two-member team of experts from the Central Water Commission, New Delhi, inspected the Grand Anicut Canal in Thanjavur and Pudukkottai districts for a first-hand assessment of the proposed extension, renovation and modernisation of the canal system.

The Public Works Department had submitted the proposal costing Rs. 2,610 crore to the CWC three years ago and the Commission gave the in-principle consent in 2013.

The CWC team comprised Chief Engineer M.K. Sinha and Director, Project Appraisal, Pramod Narayan.

The PWD contingent led by Chief Engineer S. Asokan, Superintending Engineer R. Senthil Kumar and Executive Engineer, Grand Anicut Canal, D. Revathy, explained the features of the system, the need for extensive renovation and scope of benefits after modernisation.

The CWC team inspected the GA Canal head at Grand Anicut, Adappanpallam drain, Thanjavur town, Kalyanaodai Branch Channel Head, Maharajasamudram aqueduct, Mumbalai tail end and Edayathimangalam tank and assessed the condition of the GA Canal system structures.

Mr. Asokan informed the CWC team that after its construction during 1925-34, it is yet to undergo a full scale renovation and modernisation. Running a course of 148.6-km, the GA Canal irrigates an estimated 2.27 lakh acres in Thanjavur and Pudukkottai districts. The Chief Engineer pointed out that there were 319 branch channels running to 1,143.30 km, including the laterals, and the canal feeds 694 system tanks in the two districts.

The Chief Engineer pointed out that the canal system was not operating to its optimum condition due to seepages, slippages, etc. Tail-end area farmers were being deprived of their due share of water because of operational loss that has resulted in overall reduction in the designed capacity in terms of conveyance efficiency.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.