Vinodhini’s father cross-examined

All six witnesses stood by their testimonies during cross-examination

June 14, 2013 11:28 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:17 pm IST - KARAIKAL:

Jayapal, father of the acid attack victim Vinodhini. Photo: R. Ragu

Jayapal, father of the acid attack victim Vinodhini. Photo: R. Ragu

The father of acid attack victim Vinodhini, a prime witness to the crime, was cross-examined by defence counsel on Thursday, the second day of the trial in the district and sessions court here.

Lawyers for the accused, Suresh Kumar, disputed the exact crossroads at which acid was hurled at 23-year-old Vinodhini by her spurned pursuer in November last.

Contesting her father, 56-year-old Jayabalan’s testimony, the defence counsel suggested that Jayabalan was not even present at the scene and that he was “tutored” by the prosecution. According to the defence, it was somebody else that hurled nitric acid and that Suresh Kumar was not at the crime scene. At this point, the agitated Jayabalan said, “She was my family. I don’t have to be taught to testify.” Sessions Judge Margaret Roselin intervened to calm him.

According to the defence lawyer, there was a discrepancy in the depositions of two witnesses with regard to the name of the street where the incident took place. The judge advised the counsel to pose the question instead to other witness and not to the victim’s father, who stood by his testimony.

The trial began on Monday and continued here on Thursday with six prime witnesses, including Vinodhini’s parents and a friend present at the time of the attack, being cross-examined by the defence. All six witnesses stood by their testimonies during the cross-examination.

The court, besides taking up the deposition of 10 prime eye-witnesses on day one, had also recorded expert testimony, including that of a finger-print expert from the Finger Print Bureau, Puducherry; a Chemical Examiner from the Government Chemical Laboratory, Puducherry, on the properties of nitric acid; two doctors from the casualty ward and the resident medical officer of Karaikal Government Hospital; and doctors from Kilpauk Medical College Hospital, Chennai, where the girl was treated for over three months till the time of her death in February.

The prosecution awaits the testimony of the magistrate who recorded the dying declaration, police witnesses, and the doctor who conducted the autopsy. Recording of their deposition has been posted for June 25.

Awaiting relieving order

Judge Margaret Roselin is under transfer and is awaiting her relieving order. She will be replaced by a sub-judge from Yanam, elevated as a district judge and transferred to Karaikal.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.