Seeman booked for hailing Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination

NTK leader stands by his controversial comments

October 15, 2019 01:01 am | Updated 02:38 am IST - VILLUPURAM

Naam Tamizhar Katchi leader Seeman, in this file photo.

Naam Tamizhar Katchi leader Seeman, in this file photo.

The Vikravandi police have filed a case against Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK) leader Seeman for delivering a provocative speech hailing the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi at an election meeting in the Assembly constituency on October 11.

While addressing a meeting meant to canvas for the party’s candidate, K. Kandasamy, in Vikravandi, where a byelection is due on October 21, Mr. Seeman hailed the assassination of the former Prime Minister, holding him responsible for the killing of Tamils in Sri Lanka.

Police sources said a case was registered against Mr. Seeman after R.P. Ramesh, district president of the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC), lodged a complaint with the Vikravandi police, seeking his immediate arrest.

The NTK leader was booked under Sections 153 A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony) and 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace) of the Indian Penal Code.

Standing by his controversial comments on the assassination of the former Prime Minister, Mr. Seeman on Monday asked why people were not disturbed when a few individuals shot at and damaged freedom fighter Mahatma Gandhi’s portrait.

He downplayed the case registered against him over his remarks, saying, “What is there [in it]? There are many such cases around, and we have been facing them.”

Judge’s advice

In October 2017, a judge had asked him to exercise restraint while expressing his thoughts.

Acquitting Mr. Seeman and film director I. Ameer Sulthan in a sedition case, D. Lingeswaran, then Additional District Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, had advised the NTK leader to exercise restraint while fighting to protect the interest of Tamils.

When the judge acquitted the duo in the case, which was filed against them for speaking against India’s sovereignty and in support of the banned LTTE, both of them thanked him for his ‘landmark’ judgment. The judge had observed that the pair had only expressed their anguish over the killing of Tamils in Sri Lanka, and had wanted India to find a political solution to the ethnic conflict.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.