Madras High Court stays G.O. dissolving child rights commission

Incumbent member questions government’s reasoning

March 04, 2022 12:08 am | Updated 12:13 am IST - CHENNAI

The Government Order issued on February 23 cancelled a January 18, 2021 G.O. which appointed a Chairperson and six members were appointed to the Tamil Nadu Commission for Protection of Child Rights.

The Government Order issued on February 23 cancelled a January 18, 2021 G.O. which appointed a Chairperson and six members were appointed to the Tamil Nadu Commission for Protection of Child Rights. | Photo Credit: File photo

The Madras High Court on Thursday stayed the operation of a Government Order issued on February 23 cancelling a January 18, 2021 G.O., through which a Chairperson and six members were appointed to the Tamil Nadu Commission for Protection of Child Rights (TNCPCR).

Justice Anita Sumanth granted the interim stay following a writ petition filed by consultant educational psychologist Saranya T. Jayakumar, who was appointed as a member of the commission in 2021 and claimed to have been one of the most active members.

The petitioner pointed out that she and others were appointed to the TNCPCR for three years, and their tenure would come to an end only in January 2024. However, the incumbent government had decided to prematurely end their tenure and appoint new members.

The only reason given by the government for its decision was that it was very keen on providing a protective and conducive environment for the children in the State, and therefore, it was absolutely necessary to have “vibrant, dynamic and enthusiastic” people in the TNCPCR.

Assailing the decision, the writ petitioner said the government had not provided any reason for concluding that the incumbent members were not “vibrant, dynamic and enthusiastic”. She claimed that their work speaks volumes about their commitment to the cause.

Ms. Jayakumar said the National Commission of Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) had recognised Tirunvelveli, one of the districts allotted to her, as one of the best performing districts in the entire country in preventing drugs and substance abuse among children.

The petitioner also stated the members of the TNCPCR were not paid any remuneration except for an honorarium of ₹1,000 for attending the commission’s meetings and the reimbursement of travel expenses. She said she was still owed ₹50,000 in travel expenses.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.