Madras High Court adjourns to June 10 Panneerselvam’s appeals on using AIADMK symbol

The court said it was adjourning the appeals to avoid confusion during the ongoing election process; the expelled AIADMK leader’s counsel said they would approach the EC to stake a claim over the ‘two leaves’ symbol, and approach the court again if there were any problems

March 25, 2024 05:30 pm | Updated 05:30 pm IST - CHENNAI

O. Panneerselvam

O. Panneerselvam

The Madras High Court on Monday adjourned to June 10 a batch of three original side appeals filed by expelled AIADMK leader O. Panneerselvam against a single judge’s order restraining him from using the ‘two leaves’ symbol, besides imposing other restraints.

A Division Bench of Justices R. Subramanian and R. Sakthivel said that it was neither passing any interim order nor rejecting the plea for interim orders, but was only adjourning the appeals, simpliciter, until after the general election, to avoid confusion during the ongoing election process.

Senior counsel P.H. Arvindh Pandian, representing the appellant, said that his only concern was that the interim injunction order passed by the single judge on March 18, 2024 should not disentitle his client from approaching the Election Commission (EC) seeking the ‘two leaves’ symbol.

When the senior judge in the Bench said that it was up to the appellant to approach the EC without inviting any observations from the Bench, Mr. Pandian replied that he would approach the court again if his client faced any problem before the EC due to the civil proceedings pending before the court.

Justice N. Sathish Kumar had granted three interim injunctions on March 18 restraining Mr. Panneerselvam from using the AIADMK’s ‘two leaves’ symbol, flag and letterhead; injuncting him from claiming to be the coordinator or even a primary member of the party; and preventing him from interfering with the activities of the party’s general secretary, Edappadi K. Palaniswami.

The relief was granted till the disposal of a civil suit filed by Mr. Palaniswami seeking permanent injunctions of a similar nature. Mr. Panneerselvam had filed the present original side appeals challenging all three interim injunctions primarily on the ground that they amounted to granting the final relief.

He also contended that the interim injunctions ought not to have been granted when a different civil suit filed by him challenging his expulsion from the party was still pending in the court.

Another case

Later in the day, the first Division Bench of Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy took up a writ petition filed by S. Surya Moorthi seeking a direction to the EC to take necessary action on his representation for not allotting the ‘two leaves’ symbol to the AIADMK till the disposal of civil suits filed against intra-party elections.

Since the petitioner’s counsel told the court that he had been engaged to argue the case only on Sunday, and required time to go through the papers, the judges adjourned the hearing to April 22.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.