Madras HC rules against practice of banning temple festivals

‘Such a step goes against the fundamental right to worship’

November 24, 2019 12:57 am | Updated 12:57 am IST - CHENNAI

A view of the Madras High Court in Chennai. File

A view of the Madras High Court in Chennai. File

The Madras High Court has disapproved of the widely prevalent practice of revenue and police officials banning temple festivals whenever there is a difference of opinion among local worshippers on the conduct of such events.

The First Division Bench of Chief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Justice Subramonium Prasad held that the extreme step of prohibiting the conduct of a temple festival would transcend the barrier of citizens’ fundamental right to worship.

The judges pointed out that Article 25 of the Constitution stated that all people were equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality and health.

Whenever such a right was infringed upon, either through executive action or otherwise, people had a right to file a complaint with the High Court for getting their grievance redressed through issuance of an appropriate writ under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Bench said.

Appeal disposed of

The court made the observations while disposing of a writ appeal preferred by Varadaraj, a resident of Naranamangalam village in Alathur Taluk of Perambalur district, against a ban on conducting the chariot festival of a local temple due to differences among the locals over the place for the conduct of certain rituals. After holding peace talks and finding that no consensus could be reached between the warring groups, the district administration had decided to ban the chariot festival, fearing a clash among local residents.

However, keeping in view the fundamental right the appellant sought to enforce, the judges permitted him to approach the Collector with a certified copy of the court order.

The Collector was directed to resolve the issue, given the fact that the chariot festival had been held in the village for a fairly large number of years. Adding a word of caution, the Division Bench said the resolution shall, of course, be subject to the maintenance of public peace and tranquillity, as guaranteed under the Constitution.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.