HR&CE department cannot reduce tenure of temple trustees if they were governed by scheme decrees: Madras HC

Acting Chief Justice T. Raja and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy quash a government order reducing the term of non-hereditary trustee of Kalikambal Kamadeswarar Temple from three to two years

April 23, 2023 02:47 pm | Updated 02:47 pm IST - CHENNAI

A view of the Madras High Court in Chennai. File

A view of the Madras High Court in Chennai. File | Photo Credit: PICHUMANI K

The first Division Bench of the Madras High Court has set aside an order passed by a single judge who had upheld a 2020 Government Order by which the tenure of the non-hereditary trustee of Kalikambal Kamadeswarar Temple at Thambu Chetty Street in Chennai was reduced from three to two years.

Acting Chief Justice T. Raja and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy held that the tenure of the trustee could not be reduced by invoking the provisions of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Act since the temple was covered by a Scheme Decree formulated by the High Court in a civil suit in 1935.

Referring to the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 25 and 26 to profess any religion and maintain the religious institutions, the Division Bench granted liberty to the HR&CE department to approach the High Court on its civil side and get the Scheme Decree modified in order to reduce the tenure.

Earlier, during arguments, Senior Counsel R. Singaravelan, representing the appellant S. Sarveshwaran Achari, said, the Kalikambal Kamadeswarar Temple’s history spanned back to 16th century since the Great Maratha Warrior Chatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj had visited the temple on October 3, 1677 during his Dakshin Digvijaya campaign.

It was a denominational temple dedicated to the Vishwakarma community. Following a civil suit filed in 1933, the Madras High Court had framed a Scheme Decree for its administration. However, when the HR&CE department reduced the term of non-hereditary trustee, Mr. Achari filed a writ petition against it in 2022.

A single judge of the court dismissed the petition on September 23, 2022 on the ground that the petitioner had approached the court at the end of his tenure and hence the present appeal.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.