HC comes across case of employment obtained through false quota claim

The man worked for Southern Railway for 40 years, retired in 2016

October 03, 2019 12:11 am | Updated 05:06 am IST - CHENNAI

CHENNAI, 06/12/2011: Aerial view of 150 years of  Madras High Court at Chennai.
Photo: V. Ganesan

CHENNAI, 06/12/2011: Aerial view of 150 years of Madras High Court at Chennai. Photo: V. Ganesan

The Madras High Court has come across a sordid case of a Southern Railway employee who got appointed under the Scheduled Tribe (ST) quota in November 1975 and even retired from service in March 2016, pending verification of his caste status by a State-level scrutiny committee after doubts were raised by his employer way back in 2000.

Dismissing a writ petition filed by the retired employee, A.R. Venkatachalam, a Bench of Justices R. Subbiah and C. Saravanan concluded that the petitioner had played fraud. “It is clear that the petitioner managed to continue in service by hoodwinking the authorities and by filing repeated legal proceedings without filing a copy of the community certificate.

“Even today, when the case was taken up for hearing, we asked about the community certificate. The learned counsel for the petitioner was, however, unable to give any explanation as to why the community certificate was not produced for verification. In fact, it is not clear on what basis the petitioner was allowed to be in service without production of community certificate,” the judges said.

Provisional pension

“Though serious doubts had arisen in 2000, it is even more surprising that the petitioner was allowed to be in service till the date of superannuation, and by a letter dated March 4, 2016, the petitioner was sanctioned provisional pension when indeed no community certificate had been sent for verification to the second respondent (State-level scrutiny committee).

“The second respondent has now filed collateral evidence to substantiate that the petitioner indeed belongs to another community which is not a Scheduled Tribe,” the judges observed and granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the committee once again if he was really in possession of a community certificate.

In 2000, an internal inquiry was initiated after receipt of complaints regarding the petitioner’s caste status. He failed to produce a community certificate. Later, it came to Southern Railway’s notice that the petitioner’s brother too had made a similar claim and that his community certificate got cancelled in 2007.

Meanwhile, the petitioner initiated multiple legal proceedings and the panel finally declared him as not a ST only on June 17 this year, and hence the present petition.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.