‘Constitution does not provide for reservations in appointment of SC judges’

Law Minister was replying to a demand to ensure social justice and diversity in the appointments

October 20, 2020 05:42 pm | Updated 05:42 pm IST - CHENNAI

Union Minister for Law and Justice Ravi Shankar Prasad has said the Constitution does not provide for reservations on the basis of caste, class or gender when it comes to appointment of judges to the Supreme Court. He said this while replying to a demand made by DMK MP P. Wilson to ensure social justice and diversity in the appointments.

The MP had, on September 17, made a request to Rajya Sabha Chairman M. Venkaiah Naidu, seeking permission to make a special mention in the House on September 19 regarding a matter of urgent public importance. He had issued a notice to the Secretary General of the Rajya Sabha along with a text of the matter to be mentioned.

‘Disturbing trends’

The notice referred to certain “disturbing trends” in the composition of the Supreme Court and claimed that for the past few years, there had been a decline in representation from all sections of society in the apex court. “There is a diversity deficit in our Supreme Court and is not indicative of the wonderfully diverse and pluralistic society of India.

“Judicial diversity is fundamental to the quality of judging. Many social groups are poorly represented in the apex court. There is lack of women judges and judges from historically oppressed and marginalised sections of society... This may mean their rights are not being properly safeguarded and may eventually lead to violation of such rights,” the MP said.

He also stated that the people of the country were “afraid that a very narrow and homogenous group of judges belonging to certain classes were not necessarily going to reflect the views and values of society as a whole... as the judges would interpret and enforce law based on their own background”.

The MP insisted that the Parliament must step in to ensure social justice and diversity in appointments to the highest court in the country. In a reply dated October 10, the Law Minister had told the MP that the Supreme Court judges were appointed under Article 124 of the Constitution which does not provide for any reservation.

He further said that out of the sanctioned strength of 34 judges, the Supreme Court, now, had a working strength of 30, including two women, three from minority communities and one from a Scheduled Caste.

Mr. Prasad also stated that the Supreme Court judges were being appointed predominantly from among the Chief Justices and judges of the various High Courts. Hence, the Centre had been impressing upon the need to give due consideration to suitable candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, minorities and women while making appointments to the High Courts.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.