Rajiv assassination: convict Perarivalan's mother Arputhammal seeks mercy killing of son

She tells The Hindu that she had been let down both by the Centre and the State.

June 15, 2018 05:16 pm | Updated 08:40 pm IST - CHENNAI

 Arputhammal said the State had not pursued Perarivalan’s case effectively.

Arputhammal said the State had not pursued Perarivalan’s case effectively.

Arputhammal, mother of life convict A.G Perarivalan in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, has sought the mercy killing of her son. He has been in prison for over 27 years now.

Her appeal to the Central and Tamil Nadu governments comes in the wake of President Ram Nath Kovind rejecting State government’s request to release the seven prisoners convicted for the assassination of the former Prime Minister on the night of May 21, 1991, at Sriperumbudur, near Chennai.

The Hindu published an exclusive report on Mr. Kovind conveying to the State government that the “Centre doesn’t concur with its view” on releasing the prisoners.

Reacting to the President’s decision, Ms. Arputhammal told The Hindu that she had been let down both by the Centre and the State. After giving her hope that her son would be released, the State had not pursued his case effectively.

“Former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa assured me that my son would come home soon . We feel dejected now...I am going to write to the central and state governments seeking mercy killing of my son. He has already suffered 27 years of incarceration and is down with various ailments. I can’t see him suffer anymore, it is better that the government kills him. You [the government] couldn’t use your powers to release him, at least kill him to end his suffering,” she said.

Perarivalan’s counsel S. Prabu Ramasubramanian said the Centre had sought to reply to Tamil Nadu’s petition seeking concurrence on the premature release of the convicts by routing its decision through Rashtrapati Bhavan.

By doing so, the Centre had snatched the powers of the State to approach the Governor to pardon the convicts by exercising his powers under Article 161. Quoting a Supreme Court judgment, he said every document and decision of the government authorities, including the President of India, was subject to judicial scrutiny.

“We will challenge the decision of the President against the release of the convicts. The pardoning powers of the President and the Governor are similar but not the same,” Mr. Ramasubramanian said.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.