Bull fight, an inextricable feature of Tamil culture

Updated - November 17, 2021 03:16 am IST

Published - January 09, 2016 02:26 am IST - CHENNAI:

How far is jallikattu a part of Tamil culture and ancient tradition? A translation of Kalitogai , a major work in Sangam literature, by A.K. Ramanujan gives a vivid description of the ancient sport known as Eru Thazuval : “That the bull is wilder than an elephant gone wild; do not loosen your hand’s grip on him, and the shoulders of our girl will bring you victory flags.”

P.A. Krishnan, writing a preface to the English translation of Vaadivaasal , a book on jallikattu by C.S. Chellappa, notes that there is another poem in Kalitokai that says “if a shepherd boy is afraid of hugging a bull, he will not be hugged by a shepherd girl even in his next birth.”

Noted historian A.L. Basham in his book, The Wonder that is India , says the bullfight was looked at as an ordeal to test the manhood of young men “since it is stated that the girls who watched the performance would choose their husbands from among the successful competitors in a sort of Tamil swayamvara .”

However, he hastens to add that “though Tamil literature gives no evidence of this, the bullfight had certainly some ritual significance, and was connected with the fertility of crops.” Over the years, the sport came to be seen as an inextricable feature of Tamil culture, with embellishments being added to the lore around it. Tamil scholar V. Arasu, however, explains that the story has nothing to do with Tamil literature or tradition. “Such stories find a place in later literature only as references,” he says.

Basham also appears to note that far from being associated with glory, it was a gory sport. Though there was no attempt to kill the bull, it “was evidently a sport of great danger, for the poem contains a gory description of a victorious bull, his horns hung with the entrails of his unsuccessful opponents.”

Mr. Arasu said jallikattu was a continuation of a pastoral society’s bond with the cattle, rejecting the argument that it caused cruelty to the animal and danger to tamers. “From a colonial perspective it is cruel. Can we give up using automobiles because of accidents,” he asks.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.