Supreme Court sets aside High Court order dismissing plea challenging Mizoram Government’s notification on Scheduled Tribe quota

Apex court orders petition concerning the Mizoram (Selection of Candidates for Higher Technical Courses) (Amendment) Rules notified in May 2021 to be restored in the files of the Gauhati High Court

July 24, 2023 04:38 pm | Updated 04:38 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The High Court had rejected the petition on June 21 on the ground that a legal question related to the State notification was pending before a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court.

The High Court had rejected the petition on June 21 on the ground that a legal question related to the State notification was pending before a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court. | Photo Credit: S. Subramanium

The Supreme Court on Monday set aside a Gauhati High Court order dismissing a petition seeking to quash a Mizoram Government notification which arbitrarily sub-classified the Scheduled Tribes of the State while allegedly discriminating against non-Mizo Scheduled Tribes.

The High Court had rejected the petition on June 21 on the ground that a legal question related to the State notification was pending before a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court.

A three-judge Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, in its order, observed that the High Court ought not to have dismissed the petition merely on the ground that there was a reference pending before a Constitution Bench. The apex court ordered the petition to be restored in the files of the High Court.

The notification in question is Mizoram (Selection of Candidates for Higher Technical Courses) (Amendment) Rules notified in May 2021.

The Mizoram Chakma Students’ Union, represented by senior advocate Aditya Sondhi and advocate Vikram Hegde, contended that the State notification reserves 93% seats in higher technical education exclusively for permanent residents of Mizoram belonging to Category I, which consists solely of the Zo ethnic tribe or the majority Mizos. On the other hand, only 1 % of seats were designated for ‘children of other local permanent Scheduled Tribe (ST) (Non-Zo) residents of the State of Mizoram’, who are placed in Category II.

The students’ union had argued in the High Court that the notification violated the Supreme Court judgment in the E.V. Chinnaiah case, which had held that sub-classification of Scheduled Tribes was not permissible.

However, the High Court had rejected the arguments by the students’ body, reasoning that the Chinnaiah judgment was referred to a seven-judge Bench in 2020 by the apex court.

“We find merit in the petitioner’s submission that the High Court ought not to have dismissed the petition merely because the reference in the E.V. Chinnaiah judgment is pending before a larger Bench,” the apex court ordered.

The Bench also recorded the Mizoram Government’s submission that it had already declared a provisional NEET 2023 merit list de hors (without) any sub-classification of the Scheduled Tribes. Three candidates belonging to the Chakma are part of this list.

The court gave the students’ body liberty to move the High Court for any future relief.

In its petition, the students’ union had said the allocation of reserved seats for each category lacked consideration for their representation in the population.

It had further argued that the notification placed additional requirements for the candidates falling under Category II and III.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.