Stay hanging until review plea is disposed of, Bhullar’s wife asks court

Updated - November 16, 2021 08:14 pm IST

Published - May 08, 2013 03:00 am IST - New Delhi

Navneet Kaur on Tuesday moved the Supreme Court seeking a stay on execution of her husband, Devender Pal Singh Bhullar, until a petition seeking review of the April 12 judgment, rejecting the plea for commutation of the death sentence, was disposed of.

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani and K.T.S. Tulsi ‘mentioned’ the filing of the writ petition before a Bench comprising Chief Justice Altamas Kabir and Justices Vikramajit Sen and Kurian Joseph, and pleaded for stay of the execution. The CJI asked Mr. Jethmalani, “How many times will you approach the court?” He, however, said the court would consider the plea.

In her writ petition, Ms. Kaur said that on April 26, she and her husband, Bhullar, who was mentally ill, had filed a petition seeking review of the April 12 judgment. She had a serious apprehension that her husband, a Punjab militant, would be executed even as the review petition was still pending.

“By convicting Bhullar and awarding the death sentence on the basis of a confession, the trial court as well as the Supreme Court not only committed a grave error of law but also diverted itself from the usual practice and procedure laid down in other judgments under TADA. The confirmation of capital punishment and subsequent dismissal of his review petition as well as curative petition by this court are a grave injustice,” she said.

The petitioner referred to the dissenting judgment given by Justice M.B. Shah (a three-judge Bench by a majority of 2:1 upheld the death sentence), who had said there was no evidence against Bhullar as it would be unsafe to rely solely on the alleged confession recorded by the investigating officer. Further, a perusal of the file which was sent to the President in 2005 and 2011 made no reference to the three reasons given by Justice Shah for acquitting Bhullar of the charges.

Insofar as the other evidence against the accused was concerned, Ms. Kaur said there were no eyewitnesses who identified her husband, nor was there any fingerprint or scientific evidence which connected him to the offence. Failure to advert to the reasons given by Justice Shah while considering the mercy petition was violative of the direction given in the majority judgment, which confirmed the death sentence.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.