Stand at U.N. Human Rights Council on Palestine not new: India

Palestinian Foreign Minister has said India’s action ‘stifled’ human rights of ‘all people’.

June 03, 2021 11:47 pm | Updated 11:47 pm IST - NEW DELHI

A picture taken on May 19, 2021 in Gaza city shows Palestinian Mohammad al-Hadidi at his brother's house feeding his son Omar — who was pulled alive from under the rubble while his mother and four brothers perished in an Israeli airstrike on May 15 on the Shati refugee camp.

A picture taken on May 19, 2021 in Gaza city shows Palestinian Mohammad al-Hadidi at his brother's house feeding his son Omar — who was pulled alive from under the rubble while his mother and four brothers perished in an Israeli airstrike on May 15 on the Shati refugee camp.

India’s latest abstention on a Palestine-related resolution at the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations is not a “new” stand, said Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Arindam Bagchi.

The official response came days after Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki wrote a strong letter to External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, observing that India’s action “stifled” human rights of “all people”.

Also read | Palestine flays India’s abstention from U.N. Human Rights Council vote

“Palestine has written similar letters to all the countries that abstained during the UN Human Rights Council vote. The position that we took is not a new position,” said Mr. Bagchi, substantiating the Indian decision to abstain during the resolution, aimed at enforcing international humanitarian law in the Palestinian territories and in Israel.

The resolution was supported by 24 members of the HRC. Nine members voted against it and 14, including India, abstained. Passing of the resolution led to the establishment of the International Commission of Inquiry to Investigate Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in Israel.

The Indian move drew a strong protest from Mr. Malki who sent a letter to Mr. Jaishankar expressing disappointment at the Indian decision. “The Republic of India missed an opportunity to join the international community at this turning point, both crucial and long overdue, on the path to accountability, justice and peace,” said Mr. Malki in his letter.

Also read | At U.N., India supports Palestine, but without specifics

India had similarly abstained in 2015 at the HRC when a resolution sought to refer Israel to the International Criminal Court. Palestinian leadership and diplomats had similarly protested back then. India had justified the action saying that New Delhi has a policy not to refer any country to the ICC. Palestinians had however pointed out that India had been inconsistent regarding that.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.