Southern Railway drops action against loco pilots of relief engine

Railway spokesperson clarifies that no pressure was mounted on them to violate safety norms

March 30, 2024 07:51 pm | Updated 09:33 pm IST - CHENNAI

On March 30, 2024, The Hindu published a report stating that the loco pilots of a relief engine were allegedly pressured into running the engine at 50 kmph instead of the maximum prescribed limit of 15 kmph to prevent loss of punctuality. File photo for representation.

On March 30, 2024, The Hindu published a report stating that the loco pilots of a relief engine were allegedly pressured into running the engine at 50 kmph instead of the maximum prescribed limit of 15 kmph to prevent loss of punctuality. File photo for representation. | Photo Credit: The Hindu

Southern Railway has withdrawn the charge sheet proposing punishment against loco pilots of a relief engine in Salem Division.

Claiming that the loco pilots were not pressured into violating safety rules, a railway spokesperson on March 30 said that the disciplinary action was initiated only on the grounds that they did not contact the Traction Loco Controller (TLC). However, the action was dropped after thorough “counselling of the employees”.

The ‘T/A 602’ authorisation that prescribes speed limits of 15 kmph during the day and 10 kmph at night. Photo: Special Arrangement

The ‘T/A 602’ authorisation that prescribes speed limits of 15 kmph during the day and 10 kmph at night. Photo: Special Arrangement

On March 30, The Hindu published a report stating that the loco pilots of a relief engine were allegedly pressured into running the engine at 50 kmph instead of the maximum prescribed limit of 15 kmph to prevent loss of punctuality. The incident occurred in the Salem Division on March 14 this year when a freight train was held up due to a locomotive failure between Veerapandi Road and Magudan Chavidi railway stations, resulting in a section block. A freight train that followed was detained at Veerapandi Road railway station and the locomotive was detached for relief operation.

The Station Master gave the ‘T/A 602’ authorisation, enabling the loco pilot to cross the red signal and enter an occupied section to move the stranded freight train to the next destination. As per the speed restrictions prescribed in the travel authority, the loco pilots operated the engine at 15 kmph.

Telephonic chat

While Southern Railway claimed that there was no pressure on the loco pilots to violate the safety norms, The Hindu has accessed an audio clip of the telephonic conversation between the Chief Loco Inspector (CLI) on duty and loco pilot Kalu Ram Meena.In the conversation, which happened at the time of the incident, the CLI is heard instructing the loco pilot to run the relief engine at 50 kmph. While Mr. Meena said that he was operating the engine only at 15 kmph, as mentioned in the travel authority, the CLI is heard saying that three trains were detained and reiterated his instruction to run the engine at 50 kmph. Asked why he did not call the TLC, the loco pilot said that there was no instruction to do so.

The loco pilots were issued chargesheets (now cancelled) for not contacting the TLC before entering the occupied section and blamed for loss of punctuality.

Going by the content published in the Indian Railways Institute of Transport Management, ‘T/A 602’ is an authority for relief engine/train to proceed into an occupied block section. It authorises the loco pilot to run the relief engine/train at 15 kmph in the day and 10 kmph in the night.

Railway’s clarification

However, Southern Railway’s Chief Public Relations Officer (CRPO) has contended that there was no pressure on the loco pilot and the assistant pilot of the relief engine. The objective of the relief engine is to clear any train that stops at mid-section due to failure of its own working locomotive

In an email to The Hindu, the CPRO claimed that the loco pilot, despite being informed by the Station Master of Veerapandi Road railway station from where the relief engine was started, had not contacted the TLC. Action was being initiated against him only on the ground that he did not contact the TLC. “The claim that they were pressured to violate the safety norms is totally ruled out. The charge memo was issued to the loco pilot only with the intention of driving down the importance of adhering to guidelines and it was subsequently cancelled after thorough counselling of the said employee,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.