SC transfers to itself 27 pleas challenging 28% GST levy on online gaming

The CJI said that rather than different High Courts hearing the same issue and possibly giving different judgments, it would be better to have the Supreme Court hear the case and deliver an authoritative ruling

April 05, 2024 01:12 pm | Updated 01:40 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The Bench listed the case tentatively on May 1 and 2 for hearing detailed arguments. File

The Bench listed the case tentatively on May 1 and 2 for hearing detailed arguments. File | Photo Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap

The Supreme Court on Friday transferred to itself 27 writ petitions which are pending across nine State High Courts, challenging the levy of 28% Goods and Services Tax (GST) on all forms of online real-money gaming.

Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud said rather than different High Courts hearing the same issue and possibly giving different judgments, it would be better to have the Supreme Court hear the case and deliver an authoritative ruling.

The Centre had sought the transfer of the petitions from the High Courts to the Supreme Court.

Karnataka HC decision

The petitions would be tagged with a pending case concerning a decision of the Karnataka High Court, which quashed a GST intimation notice of ₹21,000 crore while holding that online or electronic or digital Rummy played on Gameskraft, a gaming platform, was not taxable as a betting or gambling activity.

The Bench listed the case tentatively on May 1 and 2 for hearing detailed arguments.

Earlier, on January 8, the top court had issued notice to the Centre on a plea filed by the E-gaming Federation against the levy of 28% GST.

The court had also sought a response from the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence in this issue. The petitioners also include Dream 11, Games 24x7, and Head Digital Works.

The GST council had, in one of its meetings in July last year, recommended that online gaming along with casinos and horse racing should be taxed at a uniform rate. It had decided against having any distinction between ‘games of skill’ and ‘games of chance’.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.