SC sets free 99-year-old in dowry death case

Says ruling will not set precedent, is based on age of accused who has spent a year-and-a-half in jail.

March 27, 2017 12:38 am | Updated 02:43 am IST - NEW DELHI

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

The Supreme Court has allowed a 99-year-old man, convicted in a dowry death case, to walk free after a year-and-a-half in jail.

A Bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy ordered Bhan Singh to be released forthwith from prison, saying that the year-and-a-half he spent in jail was enough punishment.

Singh's appeal had been pending in the Supreme Court since 2004. His lawyer, advocate Rajiv Nanda, said Singh was the third accused in the death of his daughter-in-law from burns. The first two accused—his son and his wife—died while the case was fought in criminal courts.

The incident dates back to the mid-90s. Both the trial court and the Punjab and Haryana High Court held Singh guilty of dowry death, abetment to suicide and harassment for dowry. He had been sentenced to undergo rigorous Imprisonment for seven years under Section 304B IPC (dowry death), rigorous imprisonment of five years and fine of ₹1000 under Section 306 IPC (abetment to suicide) and rigorous imprisonment of two years and fine of ₹500 under Section 498A IPC (dowry harassment).

Singh had appealed in the Supreme Court against his conviction, arguing that he had no part in the woman's death. The Bench zeroed in on the fact that he was 99 years “by now” and has suffered a sentence of one year and nine months already.”

Adding a cautionary note, lest this order would form the basis of future demands for release of dowry death accused of advanced years, the Bench said it did not think Singh should serve the rest of his prison sentence.

“We, without making it precedent in any other case, considering purely the age of the appellant (Singh) as well as the role played by him, reduce the sentence to that of already undergone and direct, since the appellant is suffering incarceration, the appellant to be released forthwith, if not required in any other criminal case,” the court ordered.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.