SC notice to Centre on coal block allocations

September 14, 2012 01:14 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 09:44 pm IST - New Delhi

Indian laborers load coal onto trucks at a coal depot on the outskirts of Jammu, India, Thursday, Aug. 23, 2012. India's opposition lawmakers have been demanding India's opposition lawmakers have been demanding Prime Minister Manmohan Singh resign resign after an audit found the government lost huge sums of money by selling coal fields without competitive bidding. The auditor's report estimated that private companies got a windfall profit of $34 billion because of the low prices they paid for the coal fields. (AP Photo/Channi Anand)

Indian laborers load coal onto trucks at a coal depot on the outskirts of Jammu, India, Thursday, Aug. 23, 2012. India's opposition lawmakers have been demanding India's opposition lawmakers have been demanding Prime Minister Manmohan Singh resign resign after an audit found the government lost huge sums of money by selling coal fields without competitive bidding. The auditor's report estimated that private companies got a windfall profit of $34 billion because of the low prices they paid for the coal fields. (AP Photo/Channi Anand)

The alleged irregularities in the coal block allocations came under judicial scrutiny on Friday with the Supreme Court directing the Centre to explain if the guidelines were strictly followed in allotting the natural resource to private companies.

Turning down the Centre’s plea that the court should not go into the issue as it is being looked into by a Parliamentary committee, the Apex Court said “these are different exercises.”

A bench of justices R M Lodha and A R Dave said the petition raised serious questions and “it requires explanation from the government”.

“There is difference in exercise done by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Parliament and PAC can proceed with the issue on the basis of the CAG report. We don’t want to encroach upon their exercise but the petition raises different things altogether. There are sufficient averments which require explanation from you,” the Court said.

The bench also made it clear that it is confining itself only to the aspect of guidelines formulated by the Centre for allocation of coal blocks.

The court passed the order while hearing a PIL filed by advocate M L Sharma on the alleged coalgate scam.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.