Supreme Court grants protection to AAP leader Sanjay Singh in alleged hate speech cases in Uttar Pradesh

During the hearing, the court told the counsels for Mr. Singh that he cannot divide the society on lines of castes and religion.

February 09, 2021 12:34 pm | Updated February 10, 2021 12:08 am IST - New Delhi

AAP MP Sanjay Singh wears a face mask that reads 'I am with the farmers’ during the ongoing Budget Session of Parliament, in New Delhi on February 3, 2021.

AAP MP Sanjay Singh wears a face mask that reads 'I am with the farmers’ during the ongoing Budget Session of Parliament, in New Delhi on February 3, 2021.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday protected Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh from arrest in a hate speech case registered against him in Lucknow by the Uttar Pradesh Police.

 

A Bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan also issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government on Mr. Singh’s contention that permission of the Rajya Sabha Chairman needed to be obtained under Section 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before prosecuting him.

 

Senior advocate Vivek Tankha, for Mr. Singh, submitted that “the petitioner being Member of Parliament (Rajya Sabha), permission of the Chairman of Rajya Sabha ought to have been obtained before prosecuting the petitioner.”

 

The court also sought Uttar Pradesh government’s response to a plea by Mr. Singh to club and quash the FIRs lodged against him after his press conference on August 12 last year at which he alleged that the State government was favouring a certain class of society.

 

During the hearing, the Bench, however, remarked that no one should divide the society on lines of caste and religion.

 

Mr. Tankha contended that the police did not follow proper procedure before registering the case or seek prior sanction.

 

The AAP leader had moved the apex court seeking quashing of multiple FIRs lodged against him in various districts of Uttar Pradesh after the press conference, saying they have been “maliciously instituted to unleash political vendetta”.

 

In a separate petition, Mr. Singh has also challenged a January 21 order of the Allahabad High Court, which had refused to quash the FIR in Lucknow.

 

In one of his pleas filed in the apex court seeking quashing of multiple FIRs, Mr. Singh stated, “In the press conference, the petitioner had merely raised certain social issues, namely neglect and apathy of the government towards a certain class of society.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.