Supreme Court grants interim bail to Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair

The protection of bail will by default also apply to any future FIRs registered against him.

July 20, 2022 02:59 pm | Updated 08:57 pm IST - NEW DELHI

AltNews co-founder Mohammed Zubair being produced before Patiala House court in a case related to an alleged objectionable tweet, in New Delhi on July 02, 2022.

AltNews co-founder Mohammed Zubair being produced before Patiala House court in a case related to an alleged objectionable tweet, in New Delhi on July 02, 2022. | Photo Credit: SHIV KUMAR PUSHPAKAR

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered the forthwith release of Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair on interim bail in First Information Reports (FIRs) registered against him by the Uttar Pradesh Police accusing him of hurting religious feelings on Twitter.

“The existence of the power to arrest must be distinguished from the exercise of the power of arrest. The exercise of the power of arrest must be pursued sparingly,” a Bench of Justices D.Y. Chandrachud, Surya Kant and A.S. Bopanna rapped Uttar Pradesh on the knuckles.

Uttar Pradesh Additional Advocate General Garima Prashad said the FIRs were not registered by the State out of "conscious viciousness". Mr. Zubair’s tweets were “malicious”. He was paid to tweet. The cases were an effort made to maintain communal peace and harmony.

When Ms. Prashad urged the court to bar Mr. Zubair from tweeting, Justice Chandrachud shot back, saying “how can we tell a journalist not to write? How can we tell him he should not utter a word? If he does something wrong, he is answerable to the law… We cannot stop a citizen from using his voice”.

Advocate Vrinda Grover, for Mr. Zubair, said Uttar Pradesh had “weaponised” the criminal law to wreak vengeance on a journalist for debunking false information. He had been embroiled in one criminal case after the other for exposing hate speech.

Bail bonds

The court ordered the Tihar Jail Superintendent to ensure that necessary steps to release Mr. Zubair by 6 p.m. on Wednesday commence as soon as he produced his bail bonds before the Chief Judicial Magistrate at Patiala House courts in Delhi.

Though the court did not revoke the FIRs against Mr. Zubair, it gave him liberty to approach the Delhi High Court for quashing of any cases — present or future — that may be registered against him on the basis of these tweets. The Bench underscored that its bail order would protect the fact-checker if any future FIRs were registered on the basis of the very same tweets.

Justice Chandrachud, speaking for the court in the order, observed there was “absolutely no reason or justification” for the Uttar Pradesh Police to keep Mr. Zubair in continued custody any further and subject him to “endless rounds of proceedings before diverse courts” when the gravamen of the allegations arising out of his tweets were already the subject matter of a “fairly sustained” investigation by the Delhi Police. The Bench noted that Mr. Zubair had already been granted bail in the Delhi case

‘Charges clearly overlap’

The charges in the Delhi case and the Uttar Pradesh FIRs clearly overlap, the Bench observed. The Uttar Pradesh Police had registered six FIRs, namely in Ghaziabad, Chandauli, Lakhimpur, Sitapur and two in Hathras against the fact-checker. The court transferred all of them to the Delhi Police, rendering the Uttar Pradesh Police’s Special Investigation Team redundant.

“Fairness to the petitioner [Mr. Zubair] would require the entirety of the investigation to be clubbed and handled by one and the same agency… The FIRs require a consolidated investigation, and not a piecemeal one by a diverse set of law enforcement agencies,” the Bench observed.

The apex court also transferred to Delhi a case against Mr. Zubair in Muzaffarnagar in which the Uttar Pradesh Police have filed a chargesheet. This case is also based on the same tweets.

“The proceedings in the case shall stand transferred to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala House courts and shall be taken up from the stage that has reached before the earlier court,” the Supreme Court ordered.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.