Sadhvi Prachi’s remarks on MPs referred to RS privileges panel

Members had charged her with violating “dignity” of Parliament

October 11, 2015 02:26 am | Updated 02:26 am IST - NEW DELHI:

Vice-President Hamid Ansari has referred Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) leader Sadhvi Prachi’s comments, referring to Parliamentarians as “terrorists,” to the privileges committee of the Rajya Sabha.   

“Members are informed that Chairman, Rajya Sabha, has [on Thursday] referred a question of breach of privilege arising out of the complaint of Naresh Agrawal and other members of the Rajya Sabha pertaining to alleged derogatory remarks against Members of Parliament by Sadhvi Prachi, a leader of a religious organisation, to the committee of privileges,” a bulletin of the Upper House said. On August 6, Sadhvi Prachi had allegedly said that “it is a big misfortune that in the Indian Parliament, we have one-two terrorists.”

She had allegedly said this in reference to some of the views expressed by MPs on the hanging of the 1993 Mumbai blasts convict Yakub Memon. “When the sentence was handed down by a court, those supporting the terrorist are terrorists themselves, I believe,” she had said.

The matter has been referred to the committee under rule 203 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Rajya Sabha for examination, investigation and report.

Senior Rajya Sabha members, including Leader of the Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad, CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury and TRS member K. Keshav Rao, were among 20 members who gave the privilege notice against the VHP leader, saying her remarks had “violated the dignity” of Parliament and the privilege of MPs.

Janata Dal (U) leader K.C. Tyagi had also sent a letter giving a rebuttal of Sadhvi Prachi’s explanation. He said her letter did not in any way go to show how her remarks against the MPs were justified.

Accusing her of “trying to hide behind” her argument that she was trying to defend the President of India as well as the honourable Supreme Court, Mr. Tyagi asked “under what law, covenant, resolution, instruction does she abrogate to herself the right to defend these sacrosanct institutions.”  

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.