Prashant denies telephoning Amar Singh to ‘gag' him

May 06, 2011 01:58 am | Updated August 21, 2016 04:49 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Lawyer and civil society member on the Lokpal Bill joint drafting panel Prashant Bhushan on Thursday denied that he had spoken at all to the former Samajwadi Party member, Amar Singh, or to anyone else from his office or home.

“Not at all,'' he said when asked by The Hindu if he had spoken to Mr. Singh on Thursday and tried to “gag'' him as claimed by the latter at a press conference.

Mr. Bhushan also denied that he had spoken to Tarun Goyal, Mr. Singh's assistant. In fact, he was totally ignorant about the existence of Mr. Goyal. “Who is he?'' Mr. Bhushan countered when asked if he had spoken to him.

At a hurriedly convened press conference, Mr. Singh claimed that he had received “missed calls'' from a landline and a mobile number around 4 p.m. Since he did not recognise the numbers he did not take the calls. Later Mr. Goyal received calls from two landline numbers, which Mr. Singh alleged were of Mr. Prashant Bhushan and his father Shanti Bhushan.

Mr. Singh said he took the phone-call on Mr. Goyal's mobile phone and claimed that “a voice like Mr. Prashant Bhushan's said that if you remain a tool in the hands of the Congress, you'll get pain but if you work with the civil society you'll gain.”

He claimed that the voice told him that even anonymous complaints filed on the letterheads of the Centre for Judicial Accountability, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation and India Against Corruption were taken note of by the Enforcement Directorate and the Supreme Court and that journalists like Vinod Mehta and Tarun Tejpal were with them.

Demanding a probe into this, he said he would file a complaint with the police and the government. “If you [Mr. Bhushan] try to gag me, I'll pronounce it to the public,'' he declared.

Asked about the result of analysis by the five foreign forensic labs to which he had sent the controversial CD purportedly carrying a conversation between him, SP chief Mulayam Singh and co-chairman of the joint drafting panel Shanti Bhushan, Mr. Amar Singh retorted, “Why should I tell you?''

“Cut & paste conversations”

On the other hand, quoting media reports on the Chandigarh Central Forensic Sciences Laboratory (CFSL) report that said that the said CD had evidence of “cut and paste'' conversations, while the Delhi CFSL had claimed that there was no tampering, Mr. Prashant Bhushan said it was obvious that “senior government functionaries'' were going along with the smear campaign against the Bhushans.

“It is obvious that very senior functionaries in this government have been going along in this entire smear campaign. Only they could have procured such a dishonest report from the [Delhi] CFSL,'' he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.