Part-time staff not entitled to seek regularisation: Supreme Court

Bench says they are not working against any sanctioned post in Govt.

Updated - October 18, 2021 10:06 pm IST

Published - October 18, 2021 10:04 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Supreme Court of India. File

Supreme Court of India. File

The Supreme Court has held that part-time employees are not entitled to seek regularisation as they are not working against any sanctioned post in the Government.

A Bench of Justices M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna clarified in a recent judgment that there cannot be any permanent continuance of part-time temporary employees.

“The status of permanency cannot be granted when there is no post. It is further observed that mere continuance every year of seasonal work during the period when work was available does not constitute a permanent status unless there exists a post and regularisation is done,” Justice Shah noted.

The judgment came on a plea concerning the regularisation of part-time sweepers at a post office in Chandigarh.

The court said it was a settled proposition of law, that regularisation could be only as per the policy declared by the State/Government and “nobody can claim the regularisation as a matter of right”.

The court ruled in favour of the Government which had appealed against the Punjab and Haryana High Court decision to regularise the part-time employees.

“The fact remains that the respondents served as part-time employees and were contingent paid staff. There are no sanctioned posts in the post office in which the respondents were working, therefore, the directions issued by the High Court in the judgment and order are not permissible,” the apex court said in its verdict.

Justice Shah wrote that the powers of judicial review are limited. The High Court cannot direct the Government to sanction and create the posts.

The High Court cannot also direct the Government to formulate a particular regularisation policy.

“Framing of any scheme is no function of the court and is the sole prerogative of the Government. Even the creation and/or sanction of the posts is also the sole prerogative of the Government and the High Court, in exercise of the power under Article 226 of the Constitution, cannot issue Mandamus and/or direct to create and sanction the posts,” the court held.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.