Palaniswami files supplementary application in SC, says party has come to a standstill

He accuses Panneerselvam of ‘disrupting’ the general council meeting on June 23 when the issue of single leadership was raised

July 05, 2022 07:44 pm | Updated 07:50 pm IST - NEW DELHI

 Palaniswami said Panneerselvam initiated court proceedings “so that the meeting will not go ahead and the party cadre will not be able to express their intention”.

 Palaniswami said Panneerselvam initiated court proceedings “so that the meeting will not go ahead and the party cadre will not be able to express their intention”.

A supplementary application has been filed by former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami, saying the “vexatious and prejudicial acts” of his party colleague O. Panneerselvam has brought the AIADMK functioning to a “standstill”. The case is coming up for hearing before a Vacation Bench of Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Krishna Murari. Mr. Palaniswami has challenged a Madras High Court Division Bench order restraining the AIADMK general council [held on June 23] from taking any decision which may pave the way for a “single leadership” of the party.  In his additional application which, he said, brought to light subsequent facts concerning the case, Mr. Palaniswami, represented by advocate Balaji Srinivasan, blamed Mr. Panneerselvam for “disrupting” the general council meeting on June 23 when the issue of single leadership was raised by the party cadre.  The application said Mr. Panneerselvam approached the police, asking them not to permit the meeting, and when this failed, he initiated court proceedings “so that the meeting will not go ahead and the party cadre will not be able to express their intention”. “This situation spilt over to even the political functions of the party. In the bypolls to the local bodies in Tamil Nadu, the AIADMK was unable to set up its candidates, as the second respondent (Panneerselvam) did not cooperate with the functioning of the party,” the application said.  It alleged that Mr. Panneerselvam, whom it described as “former coordinator” of the party as well as the treasurer, had not issued the payments for the salaries and other expenses of the party.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.