Uncertainty in Maharashtra after court order on Aadhaar

With 7.4 crore enrolments, State has covered 65 per cent of its population

Updated - November 17, 2021 12:49 am IST

Published - September 26, 2013 01:35 am IST - MUMBAI:

For a State that prides itself on its Aadhaar enrolments, Maharashtra’s plans to make the number mandatory for LPG subsidies by March 2014, could be derailed by the Supreme Court’s interim order on Monday.

The court said UID compliance could not be a pre-requisite for accessing welfare schemes. Maharashtra ranks second behind Andhra Pradesh in UID enrolments. With 7.4 crore enrolments so far, the State has covered 65 per cent of its population. It has already made Aadhaar compliance mandatory for LPG subsidies in Wardha district and planned to extend this rule throughout the State in the next few months.

“It is totally premature for me to comment. We have not seen the Supreme Court order. We will have to see how the UID authority interprets it,” said State IT Secretary Rajesh Agarwal.

Sources said the government could consider a scenario where those with Aadhaar numbers got LPG subsidy remitted to their bank accounts and others getting it up-front.

The court order that the Aadhaar number should be given only to Indian nationals could hit enrolments. Till now UID was seen as proof of residence, not nationality. “Very few people have proof of nationality like a passport,” points out Mr. Agarwal. Many are wondering whether the existing Aadhaar numbers will become invalid since they were allocated without considering proof of nationality. The State was not only planning to make the Aadhaar number mandatory for LPG subsidies but was also considering extending it to receipt of government salaries.

Critics of the scheme have questioned its status from the very inception. “Ä parliamentary standing committee rejected a Bill which proposed making the Unique Identification Authority of India a statutory authority. So how could this scheme be made mandatory by any State?” asks R. Ramakumar, assistant professor at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

Opponents of the scheme have also pointed out that making it compulsory will exclude a large number of poor people from welfare schemes. “First, the enrolment is not hundred per cent. Secondly many poor people do not have bank accounts to receive subsidies. And third, the subsidy will not be received up-front. An LPG subsidy, for instance, will reach the bank account much later. How many poor people will be able to pay Rs. 900-1000 for a cylinder and wait for the subsidy to reach their account?” asks Kiran Moghe from the All-India Democratic Women’s Association.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.