Accused in five rape cases get bail in U.P. on condition of marrying victims

In two other cases, bail was granted when the counsel of the accused told the court that the accused will marry the victim as soon as he secured bail

October 19, 2022 10:21 pm | Updated October 20, 2022 09:54 am IST - New Delhi

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has given bail to three rape accused in the past month on condition that the accused marry the victim. Photo: Twitter/@yadavakhilesh

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has given bail to three rape accused in the past month on condition that the accused marry the victim. Photo: Twitter/@yadavakhilesh

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has given bail to three rape accused in the past month on condition that the accused marry the victim. Also in two other cases, bail was granted when the counsel of the accused told the court that the accused will marry the victim as soon as he secured bail.

In the latest order issued on October 10 by the single-judge Bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh, the accused, Monu, who has been in jail since April 2022, was granted bail considering two facts — that the victim and her father did not oppose it, and the victim has already delivered the accused’s child.

Monu was booked for kidnapping, rape and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act by the Kheri district police in Uttar Pradesh after allegedly enticing away the accused when she was just 17 years of age.

“Let Monu be released on bail subject to conditions that soon after he comes out of jail, he will perform marriage with the victim within 15 days from the date of release and get the same registered. He will give all rights to the prosecutrix and his child as wife and daughter,” said the order.

On September 30, while hearing the bail application of Shobhan, who was booked for rape, poisoning, criminal intimidation and wrongful confinement by the Amethi police on the complaint of the father of a 19-year-old girl, the judge said he was told by the counsel of the accused that he and the victim were in a relationship and that she was seven months pregnant when the FIR was filed in November 2021.

“The counsel of the victim has opposed the prayer for bail, but not disputed the aforesaid facts. Considering the medical evidence and the facts that the prosecutrix has given birth to a child, it would be appropriate to enlarge the accused on bail,” the judge said, adding that the accused can be released on bail on the condition that he will marry the prosecutrix as soon as he comes out of jail on bail.

The bail plea of Suraj Pal, listed in the same court on September 28, too has similar circumstances. Pal was booked by Raebareli police for rape and drew charges under the POCSO Act and SC/ST Act as well since the alleged victim was a Dalit and minor. Pal had been in jail since July 2, 2021.

“The counsel of the accused said that the victim lived with the accused for three-and-a-half months in Surat. However, due to the lockdown, they came back. The counsel of the accused submits that soon after he is released from jail, he will perform marriage with the prosecutrix as she has turned major as per the medical evidence. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail,” the order said.

On September 22, Justice Singh heard the bail application of Ram Babu from Unnao district, who was booked for gang rape, poisoning, kidnapping and criminal intimidation and under Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act.

The counsel of the accused told the court that the accused and victim (who was minor at the time of the incident) ‘married’ each other and had a daughter as well. He also said the accused was willing to officially marry the victim and take care of the child.

“The counsel for the victim submits that if the accused is ready to perform marriage with the prosecutrix and he will keep the prosecutrix happy as his wife and give her all the rights of his wife, he has no objection in enlarging the accused applicant on bail. Hence, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail,” the order said.

“Let applicant Ram Babu be released on bail with a condition that soon after his release from the jail, he will perform marriage with the prosecutrix as per Hindu rights, rituals and customs including saptpati before the sacred fire,” the order said.

Similarly, the order pertaining to the bail application of Suraj alias Guddu on September 19 stated that the court had enlarged the accused on interim bail of one month to perform marriage with the prosecutrix. Suraj was booked by the Kheri police under IPC sections pertaining to causing hurt by means of poison, rape and criminal intimidation in November 2021.

“The counsel of the accused has shared some photographs of marriage between the two that have been placed on record. The counsel submits that the accused and the prosecutrix are now married and are living as husband and wife. Considering the aforesaid fact, I find it to be a fit case for grant of bail,” Justice Singh ordered.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.