Nuclear Liability Act: A blatant compromise, say BJP, CPI(M)

It appears no lesson has been learnt from Bhopal or Fukushima: Greenpeace

Updated - December 04, 2021 11:09 pm IST

Published - September 19, 2013 06:37 pm IST - New Delhi

The Bharatiya Janata Party, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and Greenpeace have decried any move to accommodate U.S. demands for diluting nuclear liability norms when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh meets U.S. President Barack Obama on September 27.

The BJP described reports of India compromising on crucial clauses in the Nuclear Liability Act on fixing liability as “worrisome” and wondered whether Dr. Singh was permitting this to happen as a gift to American companies during his U.S. visit.

“The reported media observation that the government is trying to compromise the importance of Section 17 (b) of the Act passed by Parliament is a cause of serious concern,” said senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad.

Section 17 (b) specifically fixes the responsibility of the manufacturers of nuclear reactors and provides for their liability in the event of an accident involving design or manufacturing fault.

“By this, the whole liability of the manufacturer is sought to be compromised and the entire mandate of Parliament is being disobeyed,” Mr. Prasad alleged.

The CPI(M) warned against an “illegal attempt to bypass the law passed by Parliament. Irrespective of the written contract [that NPCIL might sign with the American vendor Westinghouse], the right to recourse and the liability of the supplier will apply if there is supply of faulty material or equipment.”

Greenpeace said even if there was no right to recourse written into the contract, 17(b) provided for the right to recourse if the accident was caused by faulty material or equipment provided by the supplier.

“Hence, irrespective of the written contract, the right to recourse and the liability of the supplier will apply if there is supply of faulty material or equipment,” said Greenpeace Executive Director Samit Aich.

Mr. Aich said the government had made every effort to dilute this law, whether by drafting rules that had been dismissed by the Standing Committee on subordinate legislation or through an attempt to provide an exit for foreign suppliers in contract mode. “It appears we have learnt no lessons from Bhopal or Fukushima where a renewed discussion on liability is under way. Instead of safeguarding the landmark Indian law, this is a blatant violation of supplier liability that is being proposed.”

Sushanta Talukdar reports from Guwahati

BJP president Rajnath Singh said the Prime Minister should come out with a clarification on the issue. It was unfortunate that the Atomic Energy Commission had been bypassed by the government while proposing to dilute the nuclear liability provisions, he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.