PWD lax with road maintenance, says CAG report

‘Works with large estimates were split to smaller segments to avoid quality control tests’

August 25, 2020 05:04 pm | Updated 05:04 pm IST - THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit has found that the mandatory quality control tests envisaged in the PWD manual were not included in the tender and contract documents.

The State circumvented the quality control tests stipulated by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) by restricting the cost of works, the CAG report on economic sector for the year ending March 2018, tabled in the Assembly on Monday, said.

Works with large estimates were split into smaller works to avoid quality control tests. In an audit that checked 282 works, it was found that field laboratories mandatory for works costing more than ₹2 crore were not set up by contractors at the site of 85 works. Further, 119 works costing ₹366.09 crore did not have mandatory first-tier quality control tests and 106 works were subjected to four to nine tests only. Second tier tests were conducted only in 85 works costing ₹495.32 crore.

Poor supervision

The departmental supervision of works was inadequate. In eight out of nine ongoing works, the contractors did not deploy qualified engineering personnel at sites.

The CAG pointed out that PWD did not carry out road maintenance works as prescribed in the PWD manual. The roads division did not maintain chart of important roads. The PWD Roads wing did not have a mechanism for the timely detection and rectification of defects of roads.

The audit observed that lapses in arranging periodic renewal works resulted in severe damage to the carriageway. Road drainages were not maintained properly. Lapses in road restoration after trenching works damaged the road surface.

Aquaculture agency

The report contains findings of one performance audit and 12 compliance audit paragraphs. In the audit in the Agency for Development of Aquaculture, Kerala, functioning under the Department of Fisheries, it was found that the hatchery and farms functioning under the agency did not comply with the requirements stipulated in the Coastal Aquaculture Authority Act, 2005. The agency failed to adhere to the guidelines issued by Coastal Aquaculture Authority (CAA) for culturing of Whiteleg shrimp.

The agency farmed genetically improved fishes without adhering to the safeguards recommended by the Kerala State Biodiversity Board raising potential risk to biodiversity.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.