‘Polarisation’ row unlikely to die down soon

Pinarayi’s FB comment draws sharp reaction from League, Samastha

December 21, 2020 08:56 pm | Updated 08:56 pm IST - KOZHIKODE

‘Communal polarisation’ is set to be the catch phrase of rival parties and fronts heading into the upcoming electoral battle for the State Assembly.

The sharp reactions to Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s comment on his Facebook page on Saturday that the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) is pursuing dominance in the United Democratic Front (UDF) and deciding who should lead the Congress have arguably set the scene for the perceived communal divide to occupy the centre stage in the coming days ahead of the election.

‘Aiding Sangh Parivar’

The UDF leadership has already criticised the Chief Minister’s post, terming it an attempt to divide the electorate on communal lines ahead of the Assembly election. IUML general secretary K.P.A. Majeed on Monday said the remarks exposed the ‘communalist’ in the Chief Minister. Accusing Mr. Vijayan of aiding the Sangh Parivar’s drive for ‘communal polarisation’, the IUML leader urged the CPI(M) Central leadership to intervene.

The allegation that Mr. Vijayan is creating communal polarisation is reiterated not only by the IUML but also a prominent Sunni faction. The sharply-worded editorial in Suprabhatham daily, the mouthpiece of Samastha faction of Sunnis, on Monday sought to find a pattern in the Chief Minister’s remarks. The editorial noted that the observation is in conformity with the then CPI(M) State secretary Kodiyeri Balakrishnan’s reported comment in October last that the UDF is now being led by UDF convener M.M. Hassan, IUML leader P.K. Kunhalikutty, and Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) Ameer, among others. Mr. Balakrishnan was apparently reacting to reports of Mr. Hassan holding talks with the JeI leaders. The editorial stated that the Chief Minister’s statement was meant to reap more gains from recent widespread disinformation in the southern parts of the State against Muslims.

In defence

CPI(M) State secretary A. Vijayaraghavan defended the Chief Minister’s remarks about the IUML, but clarified that Mr. Vijayan’s observation was on the IUML and not on the Muslim community. The IUML leadership’s reaction betrays its discomfort when its communal stand is exposed, he added.

Reactions and counter-reactions to the Chief Minister’s statement are expected to define the political posturing in the State in the run-up to the Assembly election.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.