LS polls may prove how strong anti-IUML faction within Samastha is

March 02, 2024 09:31 pm | Updated March 06, 2024 12:50 pm IST - MALAPPURAM

IUML candidate in the Malappuram constituency E.T. Mohammed Basheer leading a road show in Vengara on Friday.

IUML candidate in the Malappuram constituency E.T. Mohammed Basheer leading a road show in Vengara on Friday.

Can the Samastha Kerala Jamiyyathul Ulama, mononymously known as the Samastha, the biggest body of traditional Islamic clergy in the State, prove its hegemony over Muslim community matters? It is time, if the Samastha thinks that the Islamic body is more important than the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) in community matters.

The standoffish relations between the Samastha and the IUML, especially in recent months, have left some bad blood within the top body of clerics as well as its subsidiaries. There is a section within the Samastha that firmly believes that the IUML should not be allowed to outweigh the Islamic body led by Syed Jifri Muthukoya Thangal.

Although silent, some whisperings are heard from the anti-IUML lobby known as the Shajara group in the Samastha that it is time to teach the IUML a lesson. Will they vote against E.T. Mohammed Basheer and M.P. Abdussamad Samadani, the IUML candidates in Malappuram and Ponnani respectively?

The anti-IUML group in the Samastha has quite a few axes to grind. The Samastha standoff with the Coordination of Islamic Colleges (CIC) and the IUML’s attempts to put its young State president Syed Sadikali Shihab Thangal above the venerable Samastha president are some of them.

The well-organised rival Sunni body led by Kanthapuram A.P. Aboobacker Musliar has been closely watching the Samastha-IUML faceoff without making any comments. The more orthodox Kanthapuram Sunni group has its tacit support for the anti-IUML group. One cannot rule out the possibility of these two Samastha groups joining hands against the IUML in the ballot.

But the IUML is least bothered. The Kanthapuram faction has been known for its anti-IUML stance, in spite of the repeated utterings by its leaders that they are politically neutral. Mr. Kanthapuram is well-known for his election-time statement: “we will help those who help us”.

The Kanthapuram Sunni leaders secretly say that they got more help from the Communist Party of India (Marxist) than from the IUML. During the Left Democratic Front (LDF) rule, the State Haj Committee chairmanship has been given to the Kanthapuram group. Whereas when the IUML was in power, the Sunni leaders had to fight discrimination from the League.

The upcoming election will prove how strong the anti-IUML faction within the Samastha is.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.