Maradu flat owners face ownership hurdle

Many who bought Maradu apartments are yet to get them registered in their name

October 01, 2019 01:43 am | Updated December 03, 2021 08:02 am IST - KOCHI

KOCHI, Kerala, 19/09/2019: FOR GROUND ZERO ONLY : A view of Jain Housing's Apartments at Maradu, located on the banks of Kochi backwaters on May 14, 2019. The Supreme Court has ordered the demolition of five apartments in Maradu municipality including this, that have come up in violation of the Coastal Regulation Zone guidelines. Photo : Thulasi Kakkat/The Hindu

KOCHI, Kerala, 19/09/2019: FOR GROUND ZERO ONLY : A view of Jain Housing's Apartments at Maradu, located on the banks of Kochi backwaters on May 14, 2019. The Supreme Court has ordered the demolition of five apartments in Maradu municipality including this, that have come up in violation of the Coastal Regulation Zone guidelines. Photo : Thulasi Kakkat/The Hindu

A vexed legal tangle awaits the Balakrishnan Nair committee constituted to look into the disbursement of compensation for Maradu apartment owners as the ownership of more than half of the total number of apartments is still with the builders.

An initial assessment of the ownership records available with the Maradu municipality indicated that 191 of the 343 individual apartments were still with the builders. It appeared that in a large number of cases, individual buyers did not bother to get the ownership of the flats changed to their name even after completing the payment.

Compensation issue

In all such cases, the name of the builders would be entered as owners of the apartments in revenue records, making the identification of the real owners eligible for compensation a complicated issue.

All the 122 apartments in Jain Coral Cove were found to be in the name of the builder in revenue and municipal records. Ownership certificates have not been issued to individual apartment owners as the entire structure was reported to be an illegal one.

In H2O Holy Faith, 49 flats were found owned by the builder whereas the builder of Alfa Serene had 11 and the builder of Golden Kayaloram had nine housing units against their names.

The builders are ineligible for the compensation awarded by the Supreme Court as the court has frozen their assets and bank accounts. While asking the State to pay the individual apartment owners ₹25 lakh each as interim compensation in four weeks, the court had directed to recover the amount from the builders.

A few apartment owners have already raised the ownership issue with the civic authorities of Maradu. The individual apartment owners may have the sale deeds and other documents in their possession but not the crucial ownership certificate.

It raises the question whether they could be considered as the legal owner of the apartments when the name of the builder is shown as the owner of the property in the revenue records, revenue officials said.

It would the first issue that may come up for consideration of the Balakrishnan Nair committee . The residents have been advised to take up the issue with the committee, sources said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.