Explained | Proposed eco-sensitive zone in Neyyar and Peppara wildlife sanctuaries

April 07, 2022 03:48 pm | Updated April 09, 2022 04:05 pm IST

The story so far

On March 25, the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) issued a draft notification to declare an Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) that will encompass large swathes of human-inhabited areas around the Neyyar and the Peppara wildlife sanctuaries in Thiruvananthapuram.

What is the notification about?

The draft notification seeks to conserve and protect an area of 70.906 sq km, which will extend up to 2.72 km from the boundaries of the protected areas of the sanctuaries.

The two sanctuaries, which form part of the core area of the Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve in the Western Ghats, are known to be blessed with rich biodiversity. Studies have discovered around 1000 species of flowering plants that belong to 132 families in the protected areas. Besides, they are known to sustain diverse fauna including 43 mammal species, 233 bird species, 46 reptile species, 13 amphibian species, 27 marine species and a wide variety of butterflies and odonates. The endangered Myristica swamps are also endemic to the protected areas.

The proposed ESZ that extends to a maximum of 2.72 km in the west and 2.39 km in the northwest directions from the boundaries of the sanctuaries is intended to preserve such ecological abundance.

Which areas will become part of the proposed zone?

The ESZ will be spread across the villages of Kallikkad and Amboori in Neyyattinkara taluk, Vazhichal village in Kattakada taluk, and Mannoorkara and Vithura villages in Nedumangad taluk. The Amboori grama panchayat considers itself to be the “worst affected” as 10 out of its 13 wards will come under the zone.

What activities are bound to be prohibited in the ESZ?

The draft notification chiefly proposes a blanket prohibition on 15 activities. These include a ban on all new and existing commercial mining, stone quarrying and crushing units. New industries and expansion of existing polluting industries shall not be permitted. The restrictions will also prevent the setting up for major hydroelectric projects, solid waste disposal sites, large-scale commercial livestock and poultry farms, saw mills, other wood-based industrial units and brick kilns.

It will also stop the use or production of hazardous substances, discharge of untreated effluents in natural waterbodies or land area, manufacture and storage of explosives items, commercial use of firewood, dumping of solid, plastic and chemical wastes in rivers and land areas, and encroachment of riverbanks.

What activities will be strictly regulated?

No constructions of any kind, including hotels and resorts, will be permitted within 1 kilometre of the protected areas. Only small-scale industries that are classified as non-polluting by the Central Pollution Control Board can be established in the zone. No trees can be felled in the forest or government or revenue or private lands without prior permission of a competent authority in the State government.

Other activities that will be regulated include collection of non-timber forest produce, erection of electrical and communication towers, cable-laying, infrastructure development including widening of existing roads and construction of new ones, tourism-related activities, night-time vehicular movement, discharge of treated waste water and effluents, commercial extraction of surface and ground water and solid waste management.

The local communities will be permitted to continue ongoing agriculture, horticulture, dairy farming and aquaculture under applicable laws.

What activities will be promoted in the zone?

The eco-friendly activities that will be encouraged include rain water harvesting, organic farming, cottage industries, use of renewable energy and fuels, agro-forestry, eco-friendly transport, restoration of degraded forests, horticulture and herbal plantation and propagation of environmental awareness.

What are the other provisions of the notification?

The draft notification also mandates the preparation of a Zonal Master Plan in consultation with various departments to regulate development in the ESZ and ensure the regulations are strictly adhered to. A master plan for tourism that will regulate new tourism activities and expansion of existing ones will form a component of the Zonal Master Plan.

A monitoring committee chaired by the District Collector will also have to be constituted to monitor the ESZ. It will also comprise the district panchayat president, a representative of a non-governmental organisation involved in natural conservation, an expert in ecology and environment from a reputed institution or university in the State and a representative of the Kerala State Biodiversity Board as its members and the Thiruvananthapuram Wildlife Warden as its member secretary.

What are the apprehensions and demands of the local populace?

The local bodies fear that the regulations could adversely impact normal life as well as their growth prospects. The restrictions are likely to hinder the ongoing infrastructure development projects including the Hill Highway project that is aimed at improving road connectivity in the high ranges.

The residents, some of whose families settled in these parts over seven decades ago, fear such hindrances could also stagnate the quality of life and eventually lead to a phased migration from the region. Numerous families who have been awaiting the disbursal of title deeds for occupied lands also feared the notification could dash their hopes.

Farmers in places including Amboori where rubber cultivation accounted for nearly 90% of agricultural activities feels the regulations might create difficulties in chopping down trees for replanting.

Under such circumstances, the local bodies are up in arms against the draft notification and are demanding the exclusion of inhabited areas from such regulations. Amboori and Kallikkad grama panchayats have observed hartals with the others gearing up for similar protests.

What is State Government’s stance?

Faced with immense pressure from communities cutting across political affiliation, the government has endorsed the need to modify the contours of the zone. Forest Minister A.K. Saseendran has convened a meeting of people’s representatives on April 8 to discuss the issue. Sources close to him point out that efforts will be made to confine regulations to the Neyyar and the Peppara sanctuaries.

While the MoEFCC has provided 60 days to raise objections or suggestions on the proposals, the State government will be provided an opportunity to submit a revised proposal at a later stage. In view of similar exercises to declare ESZs made in the recent past, the government remains optimistic that the Centre will accept its recommendations.

Human habitations and agricultural lands around the Thattekad bird sanctuary in Ernakulam district were recently excluded from the proposed ESZ on the basis of the State government’s proposal that followed widespread protests. As a result, an expert committee of the MoEFCC has recommended bringing down the extent of the proposed ESZ from 28.444 sq.km to 16.52 sq.km.

Top News Today


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.