Ex-staff under scanner as UAE consulate hints at forgery

Customs sleuths examining authenticity of diplomatic cargo clearance documents

July 09, 2020 06:31 pm | Updated 06:31 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram

The Customs Department is examining whether some people working on a “request basis” for the consulate of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) here had used forged documents to illegally import gold into the country in diplomatic air cargo consignments from the Gulf on at least eight occasions since January.

The examination of one such consignment in the presence of UAE officials on July 3 had revealed 30 kg of gold concealed in imported piping. The discovery has triggered a major investigation that spanned international borders.

A senior consulate official has reportedly informed Customs enforcers that he was willing to testify before a magistrate voluntarily that the documents produced for clearing the consignment were counterfeit.

Signatures

He has also questioned the authenticity of the signatures on the papers submitted to get cargo clearance through the diplomatic green channel.

The official had spoken to investigators for over 12 hours recently at the instance of his superiors. Investigators said they hoped the official would give a sworn statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Such a statement would have legal sanctity even if the UAE posted the official out of the country.

The current phase of the probe appeared focussed more on a “woman respondent” who had contacted a Customs official at the air cargo complex here last week.

They said she had attempted to lobby for the clearance of the shipment containing the contraband allegedly without the sanction or knowledge of the UAE official to whom the cargo was addressed.

Denies charge

The woman has denied the charge. In her anticipatory bail plea in the High Court, she claimed that she had acted with the full authority of the UAE consulate.

The optics of the woman respondent in the smuggling case interacting with top government officials and her controversial posting in a subsidiary of the IT Department recently has, arguably, not augured well for the government's public image in the run-up to the local body elections later this year.

Opposition criticism that the woman respondent in the smuggling case was close to the Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s office had reportedly led to the displacement of M. Sivasankar as Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister, and Principal Secretary, IT Department.

Meanwhile, the Customs Department denied media reports that Mr. Sivasankar was “a person of interest in the smuggling case inquiry.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.