CM takes a dim view of VACB working

Flays ‘tactless’ act of filing two different affidavits in bar bribery case

March 08, 2017 10:10 pm | Updated November 11, 2017 12:18 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram

KANNUR-KERALA 1110-2015;  Communist Party of India (Marxist) Politburo member  Pinarayi Vijayan addressing the meet the press in Kannur on Sunday-PHOTO;S_K_MOHAN
 KANNUR-KERALA 1110-2015;  Communist Party of India (Marxist) Politburo member  Pinarayi Vijayan addressing the meet the press in Kannur on Sunday-PHOTO;S_K_MOHAN
 -

KANNUR-KERALA 1110-2015; Communist Party of India (Marxist) Politburo member Pinarayi Vijayan addressing the meet the press in Kannur on Sunday-PHOTO;S_K_MOHAN KANNUR-KERALA 1110-2015; Communist Party of India (Marxist) Politburo member Pinarayi Vijayan addressing the meet the press in Kannur on Sunday-PHOTO;S_K_MOHAN -

Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has reportedly taken a dim view of the functioning of the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB).

On Wednesday, Mr. Vijayan was huddled together with officers and legal advisers summoned from the agency’s units across the State till late into the night.

Sources privy to the largely secret closed-door meeting said the Chief Minister was “miffed” by the VACB’s rather “tactless” act of filing two different affidavits in the politically stormy bar bribery case in the High Court. The agency’s “bungling” had caused the special public prosecutor in the case to embarrassingly cross swords over jurisdiction with the government pleader in the open court.

The inconsistency on the part of the VACB drew sharp criticism from the Bench. Administrative Reforms Commission chairman V.S. Achuthanandan publicly slammed the “blunder” as a deliberate attempt to save former Finance Minister K.M. Mani, the sole accused in the case. VACB Director Jacob Thomas reportedly told the Chief Minister that a break-up in communication between the directorate and the office of the Director General of Prosecution in Kochi had caused the error.

Mr. Vijayan did not “appear impressed” by his explanation. He openly “frowned upon” the “practice" of supervisory officers relegating complaints and inquiries to junior officers to shirk responsibility. Mr. Vijayan wanted them to critically examine complaints, inquiry reports and investigations and pen their comments/observations on official files and issue written orders on all matters so the processes were perceptible and transparent.

Mr. Vijayan said he would not brook any dilution of the Vigilance manual. Mr. Vijayan wanted to know why certain anti-corruption litigants appeared to have an “outsize” role in the agency and access to government files, a point raised by the High Court. The Chief Minister tasked Additional Chief Secretary, Home, Nalini Netto to file a detailed report.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.