Arrest of Jayarajan, Rajesh imminent, says Chennithala

Says Speaker's consent not required in Rajesh’s case

February 12, 2019 08:31 pm | Updated 08:31 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram

Leader of the Opposition Ramesh Chennithala on Tuesday said the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not require the prior consent of the Assembly Speaker to arrest legislator T.V. Rajesh, an accused in the murder of Abdul Shukkoor.

P. Jayarajan, the party's high profile district secretary in Kannur, was another suspect in the case along with 33 others, most of them local CPI(M) activists.

Mr. Chennithala told journalists that the arrest of the suspects ‘‘were imminent’’ and Mr. Rajesh had no special legal protection. The CBI required the Speaker's permission only if it planned to arrest the MLA from the Assembly or the hostel for legislators.

Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) legislator and Deputy Leader of the Opposition M.K. Muneer said the indictment of the two top CPI(M) leaders for conspiracy and murder in the case that involved the elements of a show trial and public lynching could prompt the resurgence of political violence in north Kerala.

‘‘The CPI(M) was sure to unleash violence to intimidate witnesses and prosecutors. The CBI should shift the trial from its special court in Thalassery to a more safe and neutral locality,’’ he said.

Both leaders accused Speaker P. Sivaramakrishnan of blatant political partisanship for having denied the Opposition's motion to adjourn the House to discuss the arraignment of the MLA and the perilous legacy of tit-for-tat political violence in Kannur.

Mr. Chennithala said 27 CPI(M) and BJP workers had lost their lives in mafia-style hit-and-run political murders in north Kerala since the LDF government came to power in 2016.

They said the murder of Shukkoor was particularly cruel. Mr. Chennithala alleged that the CPI(M) leadership ordered the teenager's public trial and death on the suspicion that the youngster had stoned the car in which Mr. Jayarajan and Mr. Rajesh were travelling through the locality on February 20, 2012.

‘‘It was a high profile act of terrorism meant to instil fear in their political rivals,’’ Mr. Chennithala said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.