UPSC questions tribunal’s order on selection to IAS cadre from non-SCS posts

August 08, 2018 12:20 am | Updated 12:20 am IST - Bengaluru

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday adjourned to August 14 the hearing on a petition filed by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) questioning the direction of the Bengaluru Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal for holding a selection committee meeting for preparation of select list of 2016 for selection of non-State Civil Service (SCS) officers for selection to the IAS, Karnataka cadre.

In its petition, the UPSC questioned the correctness of the direction issued by the tribunal on February 9, 2018, by allowing a petition filed by two officers, A. Lokesha, who is working as Joint Controller in the office of the Finance Officer, Bangalore University, and T. Venugopalareddy, who is working as Finance Adviser, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiac and Vascular Research, Bengaluru.

The UPSC had invoked Regulation 5C of the IAS (Appointment by Selection) Regulations, 1997, and decided against holding selection meeting as it was not possible for the UPSC to complete the selection process by December 31, 2017, as per the mandate of the law due to the delay on the part of the State government in sending the list of eligible candidates for the three vacancies notified from the cadre of non-SCS posts.

The tribunal said that the officers had pre-eminent right to be considered for “promotion” by selection into the IAS cadre. However, the UPSC has contended before the High Court that the process of selection under the Regulations 1997 is “not an appointment by promotion”, but a selection process made in special circumstances when State government have non-SCS officers of outstanding merit and ability, and hence this does not confer any right of consideration/appointment to the non-SCS officers.

The High Court, in its interim order, has already stayed the operation of direction issued by the Tribunal on February 9, 2018, asking the UPSC to convene the selection committee meeting within 30 days.

The State government is contending that the list sent by it has to be be considered by the UPSC.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.