NHAI response sought on plea against toll collection on NHs

Petitioners question legality of ‘privatisation’ of their maintenance work

November 20, 2018 11:04 pm | Updated 11:04 pm IST - Bengaluru

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore.
Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore. Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

The High Court of Karnataka on Tuesday asked the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to respond to a PIL petition, which has questioned the legality of amending the National Highways (NH) Act allowing privatisation in construction and maintenance of NHs, and collection of user fee.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice S. Sujatha passed the order on the petition filed by the Karnataka State Advocates’ Association Federation, and the Advocates’ Association, Bengaluru.

The petitioners contended that Section 8A of the NH Act amended in 1995 is a violation of the Constitutional provision as the mandate of the NH Act, 1956 was on the basis of socialistic concept and pattern but Section 8A gives “unbridled, excessive discretion and delegation of power” to the Union government to enter into agreement with private persons for developing and buildings NHs.

The petitioners have also claimed that collection of toll fee amounts to double taxation on the motor vehicles as the Union government is already collecting cess under the Central Road Cess Fund Act, 2000 for development highways. Besides, the petitioners claimed the government cannot cite lack of funds when right to commutation from place to place is a fundamental right as held by the apex court.

It has been claimed in the petition that the user fee for NHs is exorbitant and fixed unscientifically, and the private companies are charging higher fee.

The petitioners have sought a declaration that Section 8A of the NH Act and certain provisions of the NH Fees (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 as unconstitutional.

Exempt advocates

Stating that the advocates are rendering valuable social functions in the process of dispensation of justice in the justice delivery system, the petitioners sought a direction from the Court to the authorities to exempt advocates, considering them as a special category on the lines of judges, from payment of user fee at NHs. The petitioners have also sought a direction to the authorities to exempt farmers from payment of toll fee as well as all types of non-commercial vehicles on the lines of two-wheelers.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.