Little protection for heritage structures without regulations

There are at least 235 buildings in Mysuru which have been classified in this category

January 31, 2019 09:32 am | Updated 09:32 am IST - Mysuru

The MCC’s decision to raze Lansdowne Building has evoked strong reaction from heritage committee members.

The MCC’s decision to raze Lansdowne Building has evoked strong reaction from heritage committee members.

The State government is yet to notify the draft heritage regulation bill which was submitted by a committee of experts almost 8 years ago, in the absence of which there is little protection to heritage buildings in the city.

The lack of heritage guidelines to protect these structures has come into focus following the Mysuru City Corporation (MCC) Council’s decision on Tuesday to demolish both Lansdowne Building and Devaraja Market and construct a new structure in their place.

There are at least 235 buildings in Mysuru which have been documented and classified as heritage structures in view of their historicity and architectural style besides being an intrinsic part of the city’s landscape and share a slice of local history.

Sources said none of them lack any semblance of protection in the absence of a heritage regulation bill and risks being effaced. If it were to be notified, there is onus on conservation and even repairs have to be approved by an expert body so as to ensure that the original structural profile was not altered. “'There is a mafia behind the delay in enacting the rules governing the maintenance of heritage structures”', said an official,”pointing out that lack of such rules will abet their demolition to pave way for commercial complexes. There are many heritage structures that are private buildings and even the owners are against it as enactment of rules will make sale or reuse of the structures by rebuilding difficult'', said the official.

N.S. Rangaraju, a member of the Heritage Committee, said that the heritage list will be expanded for which the exercise of documenting and classifying them will commence in February. But none of it will matter unless there are rules to protect them. He said if the government itself was unwilling to protect heritage structures under its ownership then it will send a wrong message to owners of heritage structures in the private domain.

In the absence of rules, the city has lost a few landmark structures in recent years as they were demolished and they include S.K.Irani’s bungalow. Only R.K.Narayan’s house at Yadavgiri was saved and converted into a museum.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.