HC to frame charges against IAS officers for ‘wilfully disobeying’ court order

They will have to personally appear before the court on September 5

August 28, 2018 12:53 am | Updated 12:53 am IST - Bengaluru

The Karnataka High Court on Monday decided to frame charges against three IAS officers for ‘wilfully disobeying’ an the order of the High Court, which in July 2016 had directed the authorities to provide two alternative sites to a petitioner.

Rakesh Singh, Commissioner of Bangalore Development Authority (BDA); Mahendra Jain, Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department; and Rajkumar Khatri, Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, are the three officers who will have to personally appear before the court on September 5 to face charges of wilfully disobeying the court’s order.

A Division Bench comprising Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan and Justice H.T. Narendra Prasad passed the order after holding that the three officers prima facie violated the court’s order.

A single judge on July 20, 2016, had directed the BDA to allot two alternative sites in lieu of occupying and utilising two sites, which were carved out of acquired land belonging to one S.N. Narasimha Murthy, even after the acquisition processes were quashed by the courts, a civil court granted decree in favour of the Mr. Murthy.

The single judge had given five months for the BDA to allot alternative sites to the landowner.

As the BDA failed to adhere to the 2016 order, Mr. Murthy in February 2018 had moved the contempt of court petition. During the hearing of the contempt petition, the High Court was informed on behalf of the government that efforts were made to settle the dispute amicably with the landowner, and several adjournments were taken on behalf of the officers.

During the hearing on Monday, the Bench noticed from the records that on one side, the Revenue Secretary had recommended to the State Cabinet to allot alternative land citing the contempt petition, and on the other hand the Revenue Secretary himself had pointed out to the Cabinet that the alternative land at Chikkajala village cannot be allotted as per the law.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.