DMK quits UPA ship, but won’t sink it

Karunanidhi says government not only allowed U.S. draft resolution to be diluted but also failed to consider amendments suggested by party

March 19, 2013 12:05 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 11:16 pm IST - New Delhi

TALKING TOUGH: DMK president M. Karunanidhi with his son M.K. Stalin at a press conference in Chennai on Tuesday.

TALKING TOUGH: DMK president M. Karunanidhi with his son M.K. Stalin at a press conference in Chennai on Tuesday.

Amid raging protests by students and an upsurge in pro-Lankan Tamil sentiment in Tamil Nadu in the run-up to the U.N. Human Rights Council (UNHRC) vote against Sri Lanka, the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam on Tuesday decided to come out of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), arguing that staying in the government and the ruling combine would do great harm to the cause of Lankan Tamils.

DMK president M. Karunanidhi announced his party’s decision to quit both the government and the Congress-led UPA, just a day after Union Ministers P. Chidambaram, A. K. Antony and Ghulam Nabi Azad tried in vain to persuade him to back down from his core demand that the U.S.-backed resolution at the Geneva-based UNHRC be made tougher. He also ruled out providing outside support to the UPA government.

The DMK has 18 members in the Lok Sabha and six members in the Rajya Sabha. Mr. Karunanidhi’s announcement was greeted by DMK leaders and cadre, who celebrated it by bursting of crackers and raising anti-Congress slogans.

Mr. Karunanidhi said the government had not only allowed the U.S. draft resolution to be diluted, but also failed to consider implementing amendments suggested by the DMK. “It has created a situation that will in no way benefit Sri Lankan Tamils,” he told journalists at the DMK headquarters here.

The DMK chief said while the “genocide” in Sri Lanka was a topic of discussion on the world stage, India’s failure to understand the gravity of the situation and its indifference was anti-democratic. The Centre had let him down badly, he said, but rejected a suggestion that the general opinion was that the party should have quit in 2009 itself, terming it “perverse.”

He said everyone wanted the U.N. and the UNHRC to analyse the situation in a fair manner and take an appropriate decision. “On the contrary, India opened its door for anti-democratic activities and no Tamil with self-respect will accept it.”

J. Balaji reports from New Delhi:

Soon after submitting the letter of withdrawal of support to President Pranab Mukherjee at night, the DMK said it would function as a constructive opposition party. “We are not here to topple the government,” said DMK spokesperson T.K.S. Elangovan.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.