/>

"Decision to review AFSPA was taken by CCS"

Updated - November 17, 2021 12:50 am IST - New Delhi

In a balancing act, Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram on Monday backed Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's desire to lift the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) from a few districts of the State, even as he said the Congress's demand for more consultations on the issue was “perfectly understandable.”

The Home Minister, however, clarified that the decision to review the application of the AFSPA in J&K emanated from the Centre and not the State.

Talking to journalists at his monthly press conference, he stressed that this was part of an eight-point programme that the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) had formulated last year to help restore normality in the State.

Mr Abdullah, Mr. Chidambaram said, was expected to revert to the Centre after the State Cabinet reviewed the matter. “Let the Chief Minister come back to us after conducting a review. This is a CCS decision and I am part of the CCS,” he said.

If the Chief Minister wanted to hasten the process of reviewing the AFSPA, the Home Minister said there was “nothing unusual or new” or “wrong” with that. But if the Congress, a coalition partner in the Omar Abdullah-led government, wanted “more consultations,” he said, that was perfectly understandable. Indeed, he added, there could be more consultations in the Union Cabinet, too. “In a democracy, we can have consultations any number of times.”

The controversy over the possible withdrawal of the AFSPA arose after the Chief Minister recently indicated his keenness to partially withdraw the AFSPA from some areas of the State, and several State Congress leaders, including J&K PCC chief Saifuddin Soz, complained that Mr. Abdullah had not consulted their party.

In Delhi, senior party functionary Mohan Prakash too maintained an ambivalent position, saying that a decision on withdrawal of the AFSPA could be taken only after the Home Ministry, the Army, intelligence agencies and the security forces were consulted, while maintaining need for “better coordination” between the coalition partners in J&K.

Repercussions

Meanwhile, a senior Congress functionary responding to the Home Minister's statement said while there was need to withdraw the AFSPA, it was important to keep in mind what repercussions such a move in J&K could have in the north-east, where the draconian law is in force in some parts. It cannot be forgotten that civil rights activist from Manipur Irom Sharmila was on hunger strike for 11 years, demanding the revocation of the AFSPA, he noted.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.