Congress stance on NRC affects India’s sovereignty: Jaitley

The principal duty of any government is to defend its borders and make life safe and secure for citizens, says the Union Minister

August 01, 2018 09:41 pm | Updated August 02, 2018 03:02 am IST - New Delhi

New Delhi: Finance Minister Arun Jaitley speaks during a press conference after a Cabinet meeting in New Delhi on Thursday. PTI Photo by Vijay Verma (PTI3_1_2018_000201b)

New Delhi: Finance Minister Arun Jaitley speaks during a press conference after a Cabinet meeting in New Delhi on Thursday. PTI Photo by Vijay Verma (PTI3_1_2018_000201b)

Union Minister Arun Jaitley on Wednesday accused Congress president Rahul Gandhi and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of playing with India’s sovereignty on the Assam’s National Register of Citizens (NRC) issue because of concerns over “imported vote banks”.

In a Facebook post, Mr. Jaitley, convalescing following a kidney operation, said that Mr. Gandhi was taking a “fringe position” with regard to the NRC, contrary to what was advocated by former Prime Ministers Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi.

The principal duty of any government, the Minister said, is to defend its borders and make life safe and secure for citizens.

“It [Congress] is now compromising the sovereignty of India. Leaders like Rahul Gandhi and Mamata Banerjee must realise that India’s sovereignty is not a play thing. Sovereignty and citizenship are the soul of India. Imported vote banks are not,” he said.

‘Mr. Jaitley also accused Ms. Banerjee of changing her position on the issue of Bangladeshi infiltration.

“Though Mrs. Indira Gandhi and Mr. Rajiv Gandhi took a particular position in 1972 and 1985 for the deletion and deportation of foreigners, Rahul Gandhi takes a contrarian position and his party turns turtle. Similarly, the BJP ally of 2005, Ms. Mamata Banerjee, took a particular position. As a federal front leader, she now talks to the contrary. Can India’s sovereignty be decided by such fickle minds and fragile hands?” he asked.

‘Not human rights issue’

“A desperate argument has been given that this is a human rights cause. A refugee on account of persecution may have a humanitarian consideration. Illegal migration does not have it,” he added. “The principal duty of any government is to defend the borders of the country, prevent any trespass and make the life of its citizens safe and secure. Independent India has faced a major challenge to protect its sovereignty in Jammu and Kashmir. At the time of Independence and partition of India, Assam was also a sore issue for Pakistan. They resented the fact that like Kashmir, Assam became a part of Independent India,” Mr. Jaitley added.

Mr. Jaitley further said that some pre-1971 migrants may have moved for reasons of persecution, but the same was not true of all post-1971 migrants who had illegally entered India.

“There is a third category who are neither citizens nor refugees, who come for reasons of economic opportunities. These are illegal migrants. Their entry is silent invasion in the country to which they move,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.