SC insists on apology from Rahul Gandhi for attributing phrase 'chowkidar chor hai' to it

Says if you have made a mistake, admit it

April 30, 2019 06:16 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:50 am IST - NEW DELHI

Congress president Rahul Gandhi addresses an election rally. File photo

Congress president Rahul Gandhi addresses an election rally. File photo

The Supreme Court on Tuesday made it clear that Congress president Rahul Gandhi has to either offer a clear-cut apology or brave criminal contempt for attributing Hindi phrase chowkidar chor hai targetting Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the court.

“Any person can make a mistake, but having made it, you should go ahead and admit it,”Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul on the Bench told senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who represented Mr. Gandhi.

“And what is this 'regret' written inside brackets ?” Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi asked Mr. Singhvi.

Mr. Singhvi said his client would apologise for the attribution.

The Bench said it could make no sense of what Mr. Gandhi wanted to convey in his present 28-page affidavit, which expressed "regret" without apologising.

The affidavit, filed on April 29, was in response to a notice issued by the court on April 23 in a criminal contempt petition filed by BJP lawmaker Meenakshi Lekhi against Mr. Gandhi.

“We have great difficulty in understanding what you [Rahul Gandhi] are trying to say in this affidavit... What does it [affidavit] mean? We do not understand... ” Chief Justice Gogoi remarked after reading Mr. Gandhi's affidavit.

In the affidavit, Mr. Gandhi attempts to explain that he had unfortunately juxtaposed political slogan “chowkidar chor hai” with the Supreme Court proceedings in a moment of euphoria, immediately after the court allowed the review petitions in the Rafale case on April 10. He had not intention to hurt the court.

But the Bench would have none of it. “You [Mr. Gandhi] are contradicting yourself in your affidavit. In one place, you said you did not intend to say it and in the next page you say you regret saying it,”Justice Kaul observed.

Mr. Singhvi said he had checked the dictionary to understand that “regret” is also a “civil apology”.

Initially, when Mr. Singhvi was on the threshold of beginning his arguments, Chief Justice Gogoi warned him that once he began defending the present affidavit, there would be no point of return.

When Mr. Singhvi said the comment was made in a political context, the CJI interjected, saying: “we do not want to know what your political stand is, you can keep your politics to yourself.”

The Bench gave Mr. Gandhi time till Monday to file an additional affidavit. It made it clear that this opportunity should not be construed by Mr. Gandhi as an “acceptance or acknowledgement” of what he said in the present one.

On Monday, the court would consider the question of admissibility of the proposed new affidavit.

Arguing for Ms. Lekhi, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi declared Mr. Gandhi's submissions as “Arguing for Ms. Lekhi, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi declared Mr. Gandhi's submissions as “cock and bull” story and a “deliberate attempt to put words in the mouth of the Supreme Court.”

Mr. Rohatgi said the “regret expressed inside brackets in the affidavit is mere lip service.” He said Mr. Gandhi's comment was the “grossest form of contempt.” “He wanted to mislead the nation into thinking that the Supreme Court said the Prime Minister is a thief," the senior advocate submitted.

Mr. Singhvi countered that the petitioner was trying to distort the affidavit by quoting selectively from it.

In fact, the Congress president's affidavit was identical to an “explanation” filed in the court with regard to the contempt plea.

Mr. Gandhi said in his explanation that the comment was made with rhetorical flourish in the heat of political campaigning. It was also made in an atmosphere of vindication at the Supreme Court deciding to reopen the Rafale case despite government efforts to shut out new facts and documents published on the purchase of 36 Rafale jets.

Chowkidar chor hai was a political slogan used by the Congress extensively for months. It had been at the centre of “intense and frenzied debate” during the present general election.

In fact, Mr. Gandhi used the opportunity given by the Supreme Court to re-affirm that the Rafale deal was a “tainted transaction” and a “gross, brazen abuse of power” by the “BJP government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.” Mr. Gandhi said the deal deserved to be investigated thoroughly by a joint parliamentary committee.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.