SC to hear appeals in Ayodhya case

Supreme Court Bench to hear batch of appeals in title dispute on August 11

August 07, 2017 10:06 pm | Updated August 08, 2017 08:34 am IST - NEW DELHI

NEW DELHI, 18/02/2014: Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. Photo: V. Sudershan

NEW DELHI, 18/02/2014: Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. Photo: V. Sudershan

A Supreme Court Bench led by Justice Dipak Misra is scheduled to hear on August 11 a batch of appeals in the volatile Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi title dispute .

The Special Bench will include Justices Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer.

The court recently indicated that it would start hearing the long-pending appeals shortly.

On March 21, Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar, had on an oral mentioning by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, suggested an out-of-court rapprochement among rival parties in the 68-year-old dispute. The Chief Justice had advocated peace negotiations.

On March 22, 2016, a Bench led by then Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur said that Dr. Swamy’s plea to “rebuild” the Ram temple would be sent to the appropriate Bench dealing with the Ramjanmabhoomi title dispute appeals. At that time, the Supreme Court had said that the case would be tagged with the appeals and heard in due course.

 

Tension, violence

The dispute, which has seen much tension and violence over the past decades, debuted in courts since the 1950s. On September 2010, a three-judge Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court held that Hindus have the right to the makeshift temple under the central dome of the Babri Masjid. The High Court ruled in favour of a three-part division of the disputed 2.77 acre area among Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the Ram Lalla at the disputed site. The Bench had relied on Hindu faith, belief and folklore.

The Sunni Waqf Board and other parties filed their appeals in the Supreme Court against the 2010 judgment. The appeals have been pending in the Supreme Court for over six years. The litigation has records dating back to the 16th Century and written in several languages, including Arabic and Persian. The Allahabad High Court judgment which is under challenge is itself about 8,000 pages.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.