Rushikonda retreat case: Ministry of Environment panel to assess violations in December first week

Following a submission to this effect by the Ministry, the Andhra Pradesh High Court adjourns the case to December 27; it is alleged that the CRZ norms and other relevant laws have been violated in the construction of the tourist resort by the APTDC on the ecologically sensitive hillock  

November 29, 2023 07:50 pm | Updated 07:50 pm IST - VIJAYAWADA

A view of the APTDC resort being constructed at Rushikonda in Visakhapatnam.

A view of the APTDC resort being constructed at Rushikonda in Visakhapatnam. | Photo Credit: File Photo

A Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court led by Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and comprising Justice R. Raghunandan Rao on November 29 adjourned the Rushikonda case to December 27 following a submission made by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) that a five-member expert committee would assess the extent of violations that had taken place in the construction of the A.P. Tourism Development Corporation’s (APTDC) luxury tourist retreat in the first week of December.

The committee will have K. Gowrappan, adviser to Chennai-based H2O Engineering and Technologies, as its Chairman. It comprises Manik Mahapatra, scientist in the National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management (Chennai), D. Sowmya, Central Pollution Control Board scientist from Chennai, P. Suresh Babu, scientist of MoEF&CC, Vijayawada sub-office, and CPWD (Visakhapatnam) Executive Engineer as members.

It may be noted that during the previous hearing of PIL pleas filed by Visakhapatnam East MLA Velagapudi Ramakrishna Babu and and Jana Sena Party corporation in Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation P.V.L.N. Murthy Yadav against the violations of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) norms and other relevant laws in the process of the construction of the tourist retreat, the High Court had directed the MoEF&CC to take an appropriate decision within three weeks on the constructions undertaken by the APTDC on the ecologically sensitive hillock, by considering the report filed by an expert committee nominated by the court.

The High Court had also asked the MoEF&CC to examine whether the violations claimed by the State government to be “minor” warranted cancellation or withdrawal of the clearance granted to it on May 19, 2021, and initiation of any penal action under the Environment (Protection) Act of 1986.

The APTDC was in the meantime permitted to get the constructions done, but in strict compliance with the Supreme Court directions dated June 1, 2022.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.