Outrage over judge calling for rapist-victim mediation

Lawyers and activists call the directive shocking,’ ‘atrocious’ and ‘patriarchal’

June 25, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:50 am IST -  Chennai:

On Wednesday, the morning after Madras High Court judge P.Devadass wrote his order directing a rapist, who had applied for bail, to ‘mediate’ with his victim, outrage broke out, and rightly so.

 Lawyers and women’s rights activists were provoked to anger by the order that some of them termed ‘shocking’, ‘atrocious’, ‘patriarchal’, ‘going beyond the brief’ and outright ‘illegal’.

 Judge Devadass recorded in a judgment on a bail plea, from a man imprisoned for rape of a minor, who bore a child out of that union, that it was a “fit case for attempting compromise between the parties. ‘Mediation’ mode is best suited to them, he said in the order. 

“Keeping the appellant inside the jail and asking him to participate in the mediation talk will not result in any fruitful result (sic). He should be enabled to participate in the deliberations as a free man…”

 “How can a victim of a serious crime like rape have confidence in the legal system if all it can do for her is to tell her to mediate with her rapist,” asks K.Santhakumari, president, Tamil Nadu Federation of Women Lawyers.

“We are shocked by this judgment – directing mediation in this case, rape of a minor girl is per se unjust.”

Cinematic

“For women victims of sexual violence, and especially so if they are poor, registering a case and going to court itself is a process that is frankly frustrating. How absolutely cinematic to announce that it would be best for the victim to marry the rapist to secure her and her daughter’s future,” asks Ms. Santhakumari.

Advocate Ajitha minces no words as she wonders if such a judgment would have been pronounced if the victim had been the daughter of a senior government official or influential person. “There is one law for the haves,and another for the have-nots. The core principle of justice is ‘Equality before equals’- the law is clear on this.  In this case, the victim is poor, a minor when the crime happened and was left with a child. How do you ask her to negotiate with her rapist?”

“Happy conclusion”

 The judge in the order talks of a similar case where things are heading to a ‘happy conclusion’.

 “How can a victim of a serious crime like rape have confidence in the legal system”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.