Jagan denies association with Jagathi Publications

Says after his resignation as company’s director and chairman on February 1, 2012, he had no links with Jagathi

July 02, 2012 11:54 pm | Updated July 12, 2016 06:33 am IST - HYDERABAD:

Kadapa MP Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy said that he was not involved in the affairs of Jagathi Publications which runs Sakshi daily and TV channel ever since his resignation as the company’s director and consequentially as chairman on February 1 last year.

Responding to the plea of the Enforcement Directorate to examine him on charges of money-laundering as a representative of Jagathi Publications, Mr. Jagan fielded a counter-affidavit in the CBI court on Monday stating that the company had appointed its secretary, C.P.N. Karthik, to appear in all inquiries and legal proceedings.

The court had also allowed a petition by the company to replace Jagan with Mr. Karthik in all cases.

Jagan contended that the ED filed the petition for ‘collateral and extraneous’ reasons, knowing well that Jagathi Publications was not represented by him but by Mr. Karthik. Elaborating on it, he said the application was made at the instance of the CBI as the investigation agency could not record any incriminating statement from him when it had access to him. Therefore, the money-laundering route was chosen now.

His lawyer G. Ashok Reddy, who argued the case based on the counter, said the ED’s request was aimed at Jagan as a representative of Jagathi Publications and not as an individual which was not permissible since he had tendered his resignation. He asked the ED to examine Mr. Karthik and not Jagan as he was no longer associated with the company.

Mr. Reddy questioned how the ED could claim that a prima facie case was made out against Jagan without placing facts. In the absence of any material before the court, there was no justification in issuing summons to him.

‘Resignation immaterial’

The counsel for ED, Gopalakrishna Gokhale, said Jagan’s resignation was immaterial as the agency suspected him of contravening provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The ED viewed him as a suspect and not an accused.

On the basis of police reports, the agency stepped in to investigate how the proceeds of crime were projected as untainted money. The court reserved its order for Friday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.