A.P. High Court upholds allotment of ‘glass tumbler’ as election symbol to Jana Sena Party

The petitioner, Meda Srinivas, president of Rashtriya Praja Congress (Secular) Party, failed to demonstrate how JSP is not entitled to be allotted a common symbol under the proceedings of the ECI, the court observes

April 16, 2024 09:04 pm | Updated April 17, 2024 09:47 am IST - VIJAYAWADA

Jana Sena Party chief Pawan Kalyan during a campaign at Madanapalle in Chittoor district.

Jana Sena Party chief Pawan Kalyan during a campaign at Madanapalle in Chittoor district.

Justice B. Krishna Mohan of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on Tuesday dismissed a writ petition that challenged the allotment of ‘glass tumbler’ as the election symbol to the Jana Sena Party (JSP).

The petition was filed by Rashtriya Praja Congress (Secular) Party president Meda Srinivas, who is based in Rajamahendravaram.

He had raised an objection to the allotment of ‘glass tumbler’ by the Election Commission of India (ECI) as a common symbol to JSP for contesting in all the 175 Assembly constituencies, saying that its decision was in violation of the Election Symbols (Reservation & Allotment) Order, 1968.

The petitioner’s argument was that he submitted an application (for allotment of glass tumbler as election symbol to his party) to the ECI dated December 20, 2023, but it was not considered under 10-B of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.

On the other hand, the JSP’s application dated December 12, 2023, was not in compliance with the above order, the petitioner argued.

The advocate for JSP maintained that the symbol ought to be given to it (JSP) on a first come, first served basis, and that its application was not in violation of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.

Justice Krishna Mohan noted in his order that the petitioner failed to demonstrate how the JSP is not entitled to be allotted a common symbol under the impugned proceedings of the ECI, therefore, it was not liable to be interfered with.

Moreover, the applications of the petitioner were neither in proper format nor accompanied by necessary documents.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.