Why low outgo for drought relief: SC

Bench asks Union government why drought-affected States were left in the lurch.

April 07, 2016 02:43 am | Updated November 17, 2021 01:57 am IST - NEW DELHI:

HEAT ON GOVERNMENT: Ground staff water the outfield at Wankhede stadium in this file photo. The Bombay High Court rapped the BCCI for wasting water and said, ideally, the coming IPL matches should be shifted out of the State, reeling under drought. Photo: PTI

HEAT ON GOVERNMENT: Ground staff water the outfield at Wankhede stadium in this file photo. The Bombay High Court rapped the BCCI for wasting water and said, ideally, the coming IPL matches should be shifted out of the State, reeling under drought. Photo: PTI

As soaring mercury levels leave drought-prone States in a parched condition, the Supreme Court on Wednesday turned the heat on the Centre for not releasing sufficient funds to these States for employment generation under the MGNREGS.

A Bench led by Justice Madan B. Lokur said there was no point anymore in denying that areas like Bundelkhand and Marathwada were not drought-affected. It asked the Centre to pull its socks up as the need for relief was now and immediate.

The Bench was hearing a PIL plea filed by Swaraj Abhiyan to treat the situation as a calamity and provide guidelines for the effective implementation of the National Food Security Act, MGNREGS and basic water supply to drought-hit States.

“Temperature is soaring. There is no drinking water, there is nothing there,” the Bench observed.

The court said that unless the Centre allocated funds, the States would remain helpless onlookers unable to fully implement schemes like MGNREGS.

The court pointed out that in many drought-affected States the number of workdays under the scheme had shrunk from 100 to 48 days.

It noted that the desert State of Rajasthan and 256 villages in Gujarat had declared drought.

In response, Additional Solicitor-General Pinky Anand submitted that the Centre would release over Rs. 7,500 crore towards wage dues under the MGNREGS.

“We are not targeting anybody. We are not targeting the officials. We are just trying to help the people,” the apex court explained.

The petition listed Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Odisha, Jharkhand, Bihar, Haryana and Chhattisgarh as drought-hit.

It had sought the court to examine the rainfall data in these States for the purpose of declaring drought-affected areas, districts and taluks. The petition asked the court to intervene to find out about the implementation of the National Food Security Act of 2013 and the availability of food grains, rice, dal, edible oil, eggs and milk for children, etc, in these areas.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.